On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Björn Lindqvist wrote:
> 2014-05-16 0:29 GMT+02:00 Jon Purdy :
> >> Is that it's only use? Then why? dip can easily be formulated using
> >> non-retain stack using primitives:
> >>
> >> For example: "a" "b" "c" [ append ] dip -> "a" "b" "c" -rot append swap
> >>
>
Björn Lindqvist
writes:
> Hi!
>
> Is that it's only use? Then why? dip can easily be formulated using
> non-retain stack using primitives:
>
> For example: "a" "b" "c" [ append ] dip -> "a" "b" "c" -rot append swap
What if the contents of the quotation use more than one item from the
stack? How w
2014-05-16 0:29 GMT+02:00 Jon Purdy :
>> Is that it's only use? Then why? dip can easily be formulated using
>> non-retain stack using primitives:
>>
>> For example: "a" "b" "c" [ append ] dip -> "a" "b" "c" -rot append swap
>>
>
> That implementation assumes the quotation takes two operands and
>
