On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Emeka wrote:
> Is there a way of getting pdf version of the Factor tutorial or has someone
> written a software to pull the tutorial?
You can browse it online if you feel it more comfortable
http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-first-program.html
Also, there
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Maxim Savtchenko wrote:
> Great idea. It should be usefull even in this form. Just one
> feature-request - activity logging. If other factor threads are
> calling sql-command or sql-query - showing requests and responses in
> formatted manner.
>
That doesn't sound
Hi all,
playing around with the db vocabs I ended up writing a little tool for
quick db testing and management in an sqlplus style (I called it
sqlplus because I work with oracle by day) directly in the listener.
A quick example (the output is actually formatted with a
tabular-output, sorry for bad
gt; hello-web:
> /Users/ludo/Documents/prog/factor/hello-web/hello-web.factor:
> 29:
> No word named ``
> Do I have to add a vocabulary to the search path ?
>
> On 3 May 2009, at 10:14, Diego Martinelli wrote:
>
>> Hi Slava,
>> it works well now, even without wrapp
ay 3, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Slava Pestov wrote:
> Hi Diego,
>
> Try wrapping your dispatcher in an . Take a look at
> webapps.counter and webapps.calculator for self-contained 'Hello
> world'-style examples.
>
> Slava
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Diego Martin
Hi all,
I'm playing around with furnace but it seems I'm doing something wrong
at a very basic level.
I tried a simple hello world application with a dummy chloe template
but pointing my browser to localhost:8080 I get only an enigmatic
'Response Error' page.
Here's the code for both factor respon
Hi Alex,
> Your
> code caches the table in a variable, but you haven't set a scope on the
> variable (using with-scope or with-variable etc.). Maybe it should be a
> global since it's constant, or better yet, if you can enter a literal
> biassoc instead of using >biassoc then it will be constructe
xes first to get them back into shape for going into extra/. Do
>> you want to give that a shot? I'm sure many other people would also
>> find it useful.
>>
>> Slava
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:20 AM, diego martinelli
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
&g
Hi all,
I'd like to play some procedurally-generated sounds for a vocab I'm
working on (it's an enhanced morse code encoder/decoder similar to the
unmaintained one), but the only vocabularies I see for doing such a
thing are the 'openal' binding and 'synth', which are both in the
unmaintained dire
