Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-14 Thread Björn Lindqvist
I think there is a bug with related-words. Like if foo is loaded but not bar, then the "See also" header will only show for the foo word, but not the bar word. It happens if the words in the related-words sequence are in different vocabs. 2016-12-14 14:07 GMT+01:00 John Benediktsson

Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-14 Thread Alexander Ilin
Hello, John! I understand that, and thank you for the help. You are as helpful as always, and I appreciate that. I hoped that I found a bug in `$related`, to be helpful in my own way, but apparently not. I'll go look somewhere else now. 14.12.2016, 16:07, "John Benediktsson"

Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-14 Thread John Benediktsson
You save typing by using related-words which we use everywhere in the docs. { foo bar baz } related-words I'm just trying to help you with your $see-also, which I thought you were trying to do... > On Dec 14, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Alexander Ilin wrote: > > Hello! > >

Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-14 Thread Alexander Ilin
Hello! 14.12.2016, 15:39, "John Benediktsson" : > P.S., you should be able to use $see-also the way you want to use $related. Well, I had this weird notion that if I use `$see-also`, I need to use it **in both words** to mutually link them, but if I use `$related` instead, I

Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-14 Thread John Benediktsson
P.S., you should be able to use $see-also the way you want to use $related. > On Dec 14, 2016, at 1:02 PM, John Benediktsson wrote: > > It's not broken, it's kinda an implementation detail of related-words. If you > look at the code for $related it checks for a "related"

Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-14 Thread John Benediktsson
It's not broken, it's kinda an implementation detail of related-words. If you look at the code for $related it checks for a "related" word-prop. To generate a see-also list. > On Dec 14, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Alexander Ilin wrote: > > `related-words` does work, no question. >

Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-13 Thread Alexander Ilin
`related-words` does work, no question. I'm talking specifically about `$related`, which seems to be broken. 14.12.2016, 00:38, "John Benediktsson" : > Look at `related-words`. > >>  On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:51 AM, Alexander Ilin wrote: >> >>  Hello! >> >>   

Re: [Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-13 Thread John Benediktsson
Look at `related-words`. > On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:51 AM, Alexander Ilin wrote: > > Hello! > > `$related` doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone verify? > > I'm doing this: > > HELP: (go) > { $description "Implementation of the " { $link go } " word without checking >

[Factor-talk] $related

2016-12-13 Thread Alexander Ilin
Hello! `$related` doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone verify? I'm doing this: HELP: (go) { $description "Implementation of the " { $link go } " word without checking the current speed." } { $related go } ; I expect to see the "See also" section in the `(go)` article with the `go`