I think there is a bug with related-words. Like if foo is loaded but
not bar, then the "See also" header will only show for the foo word,
but not the bar word. It happens if the words in the related-words
sequence are in different vocabs.
2016-12-14 14:07 GMT+01:00 John Benediktsson
Hello, John!
I understand that, and thank you for the help. You are as helpful as always,
and I appreciate that.
I hoped that I found a bug in `$related`, to be helpful in my own way, but
apparently not.
I'll go look somewhere else now.
14.12.2016, 16:07, "John Benediktsson"
You save typing by using related-words which we use everywhere in the docs.
{ foo bar baz } related-words
I'm just trying to help you with your $see-also, which I thought you were
trying to do...
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Alexander Ilin wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
Hello!
14.12.2016, 15:39, "John Benediktsson" :
> P.S., you should be able to use $see-also the way you want to use $related.
Well, I had this weird notion that if I use `$see-also`, I need to use it
**in both words** to mutually link them, but if I use `$related` instead, I
P.S., you should be able to use $see-also the way you want to use $related.
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 1:02 PM, John Benediktsson wrote:
>
> It's not broken, it's kinda an implementation detail of related-words. If you
> look at the code for $related it checks for a "related"
It's not broken, it's kinda an implementation detail of related-words. If you
look at the code for $related it checks for a "related" word-prop. To generate
a see-also list.
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Alexander Ilin wrote:
>
> `related-words` does work, no question.
>
`related-words` does work, no question.
I'm talking specifically about `$related`, which seems to be broken.
14.12.2016, 00:38, "John Benediktsson" :
> Look at `related-words`.
>
>> On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:51 AM, Alexander Ilin wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>>
Look at `related-words`.
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:51 AM, Alexander Ilin wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> `$related` doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone verify?
>
> I'm doing this:
>
> HELP: (go)
> { $description "Implementation of the " { $link go } " word without checking
>
Hello!
`$related` doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone verify?
I'm doing this:
HELP: (go)
{ $description "Implementation of the " { $link go } " word without checking
the current speed." }
{ $related go } ;
I expect to see the "See also" section in the `(go)` article with the `go`