, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:06:34 -0700
> > From: William Tanksley
> > Subject: Re: [Factor-talk] CAMF
> > To: factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Message-ID: <1239804394.5559.83.ca...@tanksle
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:06:34 -0700
> From: William Tanksley
> Subject: Re: [Factor-talk] CAMF
> To: factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <1239804394.5559.83.ca...@tanksley>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> FICL is a tiny and elega
On 4/15/09 7:39 AM, Slava Pestov wrote:
...
> You can read about Factor's object system at
>
> http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-objects.html
>
> The object system is used pervasively throughout the library and is
> pretty flexible. The closest existing object system in another
> languag
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 19:02 -0600, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
> Hello; I just learned about Factor today, and signed up for this
> mailing list.
Welcome!
> How safe is Factor? For a company to let factory-floor employees
> program some CAM software, they have to be sure that incompetent (or
> malicious)
Hi Hugh,
Thank you for your interest in Factor.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
> How safe is Factor? For a company to let factory-floor employees program
> some CAM software, they have to be sure that incompetent (or malicious)
> employees don't crash their computer, and de
Hello; I just learned about Factor today, and signed up for this mailing list.
I have programmed in Forth all of my life. I wrote the MFX cross-compiler for
the MiniForth processor at Testra, but I haven't worked there in many years now.
Currently, I am writing a library of functions that can be
