Glenn Tarcea wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion! If I did this could I have multiple
> databases open? That is, if my constructor was and I did that
> twice, could I associate a variable with each instance?
Sure, no problem.
The idea is that the words in your library would operate on the db ha
Hi Ed,
Thanks for the suggestion! If I did this could I have multiple
databases open? That is, if my constructor was and I did that
twice, could I associate a variable with each instance?
Thanks,
Glenn
On Aug 21, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
V. Glenn Tarcea wrote:
I've
V. Glenn Tarcea wrote:
> I've been working on an interface to BerkeleyDB for Factor.
Hi Glenn,
An approach worth exploring is where you keep the bdb object in a variable.
Ed
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Y
Why doesn't bdb-open create a new berkleydb object and return it on
the stack?
I've been debating what the proper thing to do here is. That will
help, but I'll still end up with calls where floats to the
bottom of the stack.
>r >r [ dbenv>> ] [ db>> ] bi r> r>
You can use 2dip here.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:39 PM, V. Glenn Tarcea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I've been working on an interface to BerkeleyDB for Factor.
>
Cool!
Say I have a tuple to hold my BerkeleyDB data like DB_ENV, DB, etc…. When I
> need to make a call I often end up with a stack that has th
Hi,
I've been working on an interface to BerkeleyDB for Factor. One thing I've
noticed as I've worked through this is a common idiom like the following:
Say I have a tuple to hold my BerkeleyDB data like DB_ENV, DB, etc.. When I
need to make a call I often end up with a stack that has the b
