[Factor-talk] Hats: useful or just silly?

2008-10-13 Thread Alex Chapman
Hi All, I've pushed a new vocabulary to my repository (git:// factorcode.org/git/wrunt.git) called 'hats'. Hats is a protocol for getting and setting. We have protocols for assocs, sequences, etc., but not one like this (as far as I know). I've pasted the code and the unit tests below. The basic

Re: [Factor-talk] Hats: useful or just silly?

2008-10-18 Thread Slava Pestov
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Alex Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I've pushed a new vocabulary to my repository > (git://factorcode.org/git/wrunt.git) called 'hats'. Hats is a protocol for > getting and setting. We have protocols for assocs, sequences, etc., but not > one like

Re: [Factor-talk] Hats: useful or just silly?

2009-04-14 Thread Alex Chapman
Hi Slava, I've integrated hats into the refs vocab, such that the old refs are a subset of the current refs. I also updated the tests and docs. Changes are in my repository at factorcode.org/git/wrunt.git. Also in that repository are some couchdb bindings that I've been writing on and off. The cou

Re: [Factor-talk] Hats: useful or just silly?

2009-04-15 Thread Slava Pestov
Sounds good. I will merge your patches shortly. Slava On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Alex Chapman wrote: > Hi Slava, > I've integrated hats into the refs vocab, such that the old refs are a > subset of the current refs. I also updated the tests and docs. Changes are > in my repository at facto