> > How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle
back through old
> expressions?
> > Currently I have to scroll to the old
position and double-click to
> > re-enter it.
>
> I've noticed that the online EBNF help is not the same as
that in the local
> Help Browser.
It is the same, except for possible minor differences
between Factor
versions. If you go:
"peg.ebnf" about
"Shaping" writes:
> > How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle back through old
> expressions?
> > Currently I have to scroll to the old position and
> double-click to
> > re-enter it.
>
> See
>
> http://docs.factorcode.org/content/ar
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Shaping wrote:
>> How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle back through old expressions?
>
>> Currently I have to scroll to the old position and double-click to
>
>> re-enter it.
http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-ui-listener.html
Chris.
--
http://www.blu
> How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle back through old
expressions?
> Currently I have to scroll to the old position and
double-click to
> re-enter it.
See
http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-gadgets-editors-comma
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Rupert Swarbrick wrote:
> Incidentally, has it occurred to you that the authors of this program
> (not me!) are the most active members of this list? Also, that the
> author of a program might take some offence at being told that it "is
> not polished visually", bu
On Nov 10, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Rupert Swarbrick wrote:
> Incidentally, has it occurred to you that the authors of this program
> (not me!) are the most active members of this list? Also, that the
> author of a program might take some offence at being told that it "is
> not polished visually", but s
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Rupert Swarbrick wrote:
> Incidentally, has it occurred to you that the authors of this program
> (not me!) are the most active members of this list? Also, that the
> author of a program might take some offence at being told that it "is
I wondered if someone woul
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Shaping wrote:
> I've noticed that the online EBNF help is not the same as that in the local
> Help Browser.
It is the same, except for possible minor differences between Factor
versions. If you go:
"peg.ebnf" about
You will get the 'about' page for the peg.ebnf
"Shaping" writes:
> I've discovered the inspector recently. It is a good inspector, at least as
> interesting as the Smalltalk inspectors. The GUI is not polished visually,
> but it actually works better than most of the stuff that MS produces: there
> is no flicker at all during resize, and al
"Shaping" writes:
> How do I use the keyboard keys to cycle back through old expressions?
> Currently I have to scroll to the old position and double-click to re-enter
> it.
See
http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-gadgets-editors-commands.html
Rupert
P.S. Is there any way you can get out
What is an 'immediate eval'? I ask because the following
should only
come from a usage, not a EBNF: ... ;EBNF
usage:
I'm using quasi-Smalltalk terminology, but I figure most of the ideas map,
even though there is no byte-code stage in this compiler.
"Immediate eva
"Shaping" writes:
> Doing the immediate eval leaves
>
> T{ parser f ~action-parser~ f 4820 }
>
> How am I expected to use this notation?. I read: "a parser instance",
> constant f (false), "something to do with a parse and its action", another
> false constant, number 4820. I can't do any rea
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Shaping wrote:
>
> Doing the immediate eval leaves
What is an 'immediate eval'? I ask because the following should only
come from a usage, not a EBNF: ... ;EBNF usage:
> T{ parser f ~action-parser~ f 4820 }
> How am I expected to use this notation?. I read:
EBNF: expr
digit = '1' | '2' | '3' | '4'
number = digit digit*
expr = number (('+' | '-') number)*
;EBNF
I was able to evaluate this expression immediately in the Listener and on a
word I defined in my own vo
[...]
> Again there is the opacity problem. What does the
"~vector~" mean?
> And why would I ever want to read such a general
description of a
> 2-vector? It doesn't say much about what is in the tree.
You're comp
-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Factor-talk] PEGs
I tried the first two yellow blocks in this article
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/11/embedded-grammars-in-factor.html
The first block I put on a word, and it compiled. The next three evaluables
didn't not work. For example
"123"
I tried the first two yellow blocks in this article
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/11/embedded-grammars-in-factor.html
The first block I put on a word, and it compiled. The next three evaluables
didn't not work. For example
"123" number parse
raised an exception
(U) Quotation: [ set-names
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Shaping wrote:
> I tried the first two yellow blocks in this article
>
> http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2007/11/embedded-grammars-in-factor.html
The syntax has changed quite a bit since that post. The example would
now be something like:
EBNF: expr
digit = '1'
19 matches
Mail list logo
