Re: [Factor-talk] how to run-pipeline

2015-09-23 5:46 GMT+02:00 HP Wei : > My original issue was to construct the string “cmd1 -a A -b B” and “cmd2 -c > C” > in a flexible way so that I can choose to supply (or not supply) those > argument A, B, C. > And find a clean way to put everything together into { … } for

Re: [Factor-talk] how to run-pipeline

> > Your suggestion in another email of implementing >process looks > interesting to explore. > Any example usage in this case ? > Not really, I'm afraid. The only two implemented methods are here: https://github.com/slavapestov/factor/blob/master/basis/io/launcher/launcher.factor#L118-L122 It

Re: [Factor-talk] how to run-pipeline

Thanks, Alex, for pointing out the the ‘make’ word, which is something new to me. I will study the example usages that you listed. I realize that I did not make my original intention clear enough. Here is what I want to do in factor: (1) invoke custom command in shell: cmd1 -a A -b B

Re: [Factor-talk] how to run-pipeline

> > Ultimately, I may also insert some factor quot in betweeen > str1 and str2 to do some processing before handing the > result to cmd2. Do you mean you want to take the output of running cmd1, manipulate it, then pass *that* to cmd2? Because that sounds rather different from what your example

Re: [Factor-talk] how to run-pipeline

You might also consider implementing the >process method for your custom / objects, which will be called automatically when invoking run-pipeline. http://docs.factorcode.org/content/word-__gt__process,io.launcher.html Or just do away with / objects altogether and build those as strings/arrays

[Factor-talk] how to run-pipeline

I want to run binary codes (C++) under linux using run-pipeline In linux shell, the task is cmd1 -a arg1 -b arg2 | cmd2 -c arg3 I know in general, in factor, I need to construct { str1 str2 } run-pipeline where str1 = “cmd1 -a arg1 -b arg2” str2 = “cmd2 -c arg3” Ultimately, I may