Thanks :-)
2009/2/10 Slava Pestov :
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Jong-Hyouk Yun wrote:
>> Thanks.
>>
>> If deploy application which uses resource:, it have to be place in same dir?
>
> If you load the table at parse time, then the data will get loaded
> while you're deploying the app, and th
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Jong-Hyouk Yun wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> If deploy application which uses resource:, it have to be place in same dir?
If you load the table at parse time, then the data will get loaded
while you're deploying the app, and the deployed app won't depend on
the file being p
Thanks.
If deploy application which uses resource:, it have to be place in same dir?
I'll change to MEMO: run once.
I thought encoding table is almost never changing.
Thanks to your clear advice, Slava. :-)
2009/2/10 Slava Pestov :
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Jong-Hyouk Yun wrote:
>>
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Jong-Hyouk Yun wrote:
> Thanks, Dan.
>
> I'll convert resource file into hard-coded lookup table, because I'm
> not sure it works when it deployed as an image.
If you want the table to be loaded at parse time, then use VALUE:, or
force the memo word to run once wit
Thanks, Dan.
I'll convert resource file into hard-coded lookup table, because I'm
not sure it works when it deployed as an image. Honestly I've uneasy
to use MEMO: or something in encodings. I thought MEMO: is very
abstract'ed one, not matching with encodings...
Anyway, it's impossible to I could
That's great! For this, I don't think a special method for
or is necessary; the default one should do fine. I can't
believe I forgot about using MEMO: to load resource files; that's a
much cleaner technique than VALUE:.
About CP949 vs the proper EUC-KR: is the Microsoft version a strict
superset
here is unfinished code...
http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=419
anybody help me to complete , ?
I got to go to bed for tomorrow working T.T...
Cheers.
2009/2/9 Jong-Hyouk Yun :
> Hi,
>
> After coming home from office, I've worked awhile for cp949(aka cp949,
> uhc -- unified hanguel code,
Hi,
After coming home from office, I've worked awhile for cp949(aka cp949,
uhc -- unified hanguel code, and extended euc-kr) encoding for Korean.
Anyway, I found IANA registry has no entry for "cp949".
"cp949" is de facto Korean encoding, but there's not found. (I thinks
ksc codes are quite simil
