will give you a sequences-of-sequences view over an existing
sequence.
-Joe
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:18 AM, mr w wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/4/14 Boyko Bantchev
> >>
> >> On 14 April 2013 15:03, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> >> > If you s
On 14 April 2013 16:10, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> My point was that there isn't a one-suits-them-all solution for grouping an
> arbitrary sized sequence into a fixed number of slices.
I did understand that and I fully agree. And my point was to propose
a definition that:
• enjoys an unambiguousl
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/4/14 Boyko Bantchev
>>
>> On 14 April 2013 15:03, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>> > If you start with a sequence of length 6, how do you split it into 4
>> > slices?
>> > 1 1 1 3? 2 2 2 0? 3 2 1 0?
>>
>> I would think of 2 2 1 1, which
2013/4/14 Boyko Bantchev
> On 14 April 2013 15:03, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> > If you start with a sequence of length 6, how do you split it into 4
> slices?
> > 1 1 1 3? 2 2 2 0? 3 2 1 0?
>
> I would think of 2 2 1 1, which is monotonically non-increasing and
> has minimal variation.
>
My point
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Boyko Bantchev wrote:
> On 14 April 2013 15:03, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>> If you start with a sequence of length 6, how do you split it into 4 slices?
>> 1 1 1 3? 2 2 2 0? 3 2 1 0?
>
> I would think of 2 2 1 1, which is monotonically non-increasing and
> has minima
On 14 April 2013 15:03, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> If you start with a sequence of length 6, how do you split it into 4 slices?
> 1 1 1 3? 2 2 2 0? 3 2 1 0?
I would think of 2 2 1 1, which is monotonically non-increasing and
has minimal variation.
---
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:38 AM, mr w wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/14 mr w
>>>
>>>
>>> Could also imagine a "slices-n" word, that attempts to chop a sequence
>>> into slices of length n.
>>
>>
>> How would that be different from ?
>>
>>> Is t
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/4/14 mr w
>>
>>
>> Could also imagine a "slices-n" word, that attempts to chop a sequence
>> into slices of length n.
>
>
> How would that be different from ?
>
>> Is there an "n-slices" word, that attempts to chop a sequence int
2013/4/14 mr w
>
> Could also imagine a "slices-n" word, that attempts to chop a sequence
> into slices of length n.
>
How would that be different from ?
Is there an "n-slices" word, that attempts to chop a sequence into n slices?
>
If you start with a sequence of length 6, how do you split it
Is there an "n-slices" word, that attempts to chop a sequence into n slices?
Could also imagine a "slices-n" word, that attempts to chop a sequence
into slices of length n.
Should be easy to code with head-slice and rest-slice, but I'm not
playing with a full deck of cards yet when it comes to Fa
10 matches
Mail list logo
