e a
> few failed attempts? Can you post a snippet?
>
> I'd also stick with 0.9.x as its set up is slightly different from 0.8.x
> (lots more defaulting).
>
> On 20/10/2016 09:13, Anthony Griffiths wrote:
>> something is really wrong here. I uninstalled fail2ban 0.9
I'm running centos 6.8 and I've installed freepbx-13 and
fail2ban-0.9.4-2.el6.noarch, which I got from 'yum install fail2ban'.
I'm trying to create a jail to block failed login attempts in the
freepbx GUI. One accesses the freepbx gui in a browser so it's
http/https access.
I tried this in jail.loc
I'm running fail2ban-0.9.3-1.el6.1 on centos 6 and in the fail2ban log are
some entries I'd like to clarify.
1) INFO[apache-noscript] Found 68.60.239.35
does this mean that fail2ban is simply aware of one attempt by
68.60.239.35? or should it be banning it?
2) [apache-fakegooglebot] Ignore 66
I'm running centos 6.7 64 bit and fail2ban-0.8.14-1.shmz65.1.128.noarch
which I got from 'yum install fail2ban'. The problem is I'm getting a lot
of strange entries in my logwatch file every day concerning fail2ban.
Here's an example of what I get every day in the logwatch: The first bit
about bann
I'm running centos 6 and I've just installed
fail2ban-0.9.2-1.el6.noarch using yum. I notice straight away the
jail.conf file looks different and I can't get fail2ban to ban
anything. After trawling google I can't find an up-to-date working
sample jail.local file as a reference.
The program starts
I know one can unban an ip with the command:
'fail2ban-client set unbanip '
but is there a command that will unban all the ip's in a particular jail?
I did see this command
'set action actionunban '
on a google search but if it's the right command I don't understand
what I should put in place o
I'm running fail2ban-0.8.14-1.el6. on centos 6.6
hi can some clever bod please help me debug a custom filter?
the application is red5 media server and what I need is quite
straightforward but I can't get past some errors.
There's only one expression in the log file I want to watch for and that's t
I'm running fail2ban-0.8.14-1.el6.noarch on centos 6.6 64bit.
apache-nohome does not recognise the 'File does not exist' entries
littered throughout my *error_log and is not banning the offending
ip's.
This is a typical line from my httpd error log:
[Fri Mar 27 16:16:35 2015] [error] [client 78.18
I'm running centos 5.10 32 bit server with fail2ban-0.8.14-1.el5 and
openvpn-2.3.2-2.el5 and I'm having difficulty getting a filter to work
in fail2ban. I saw the example filter at
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/OpenVPN but it doesn't work for
me, maybe I'm using the wrong versions(s).
thi
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Lee Clemens wrote:
> On 03/16/2015 03:21 PM, Anthony Griffiths wrote:
>>
> If is your server and not the host fail2ban should
> block, the regex seems incorrect and should be fixed.
>
> Instead, it seems the regex should check for the &quo
I'm running centos 5.10 32 bit server with fail2ban-0.8.14-1.el5 and
Asterisk 10.7.0. some p-o-s is constantly trying to hack (my) asterisk
and /var/log/asterisk/messages is littered with entries like this
every minute or so:
[2015-03-16 18:46:34] NOTICE[3453] chan_sip.c: hacking attempt
detected
I'm running centos 6 server (command line only) with
fail2ban-0.8.14-1.el6.noarch.
This error keeps coming up in my fail2ban log after all the jails have started:
"fail2ban.filter []: ERROR Error in FilterPyinotify callback:
_strptime_time"
I haven't got a clue how to fix this and I see this
I used fail2ban for ages on centos 5 and it was great but ever since
the upgrade to fail2ban-0.8.10 the program seems to have no protection
for sendmail, even after searching google for jail.local examples.What
I used to have in (previous) jail.conf was:
[sendmail]
enabled = true
filter = send
13 matches
Mail list logo
