Dear All,
On behalf of everyone who contributed (and there were 13 contributors!) to the
development of Fail2Ban since 0.9.4, I am proud to announce that
0.9.5 was tagged on GitHub, and uploaded to Debian sid and NeuroDebian
repository happen you need backport builds. Full list of changes you
c
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> Hi list,
> What would be the advantage of using dbfile = :memory:? It is documented
> in fail2ban.conf as an option, but I don't see what benefit this would have.
I guess speed and absent persistence across restarts (if that is desired)
--
Yarosla
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016, Igor wrote:
> Sorry, I am not sure if this had been discussed before. I did a quick
> search in the archives, but didn't see it.
> I am suggesting that each filter file that is distributed with fail2ban
> should contain one ore more sample line(s) for each of the regex li
Dear All,
On behalf of everyone who contributed (and there were 30 people!) to the
development of Fail2Ban since 0.9.3, I am proud to announce that
0.9.4 was tagged on GitHub, and uploaded to Debian sid. master branch is
ready to accept new PRs but you might need to re-merge master into it or re
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I'm using Debian stable and can't get fail2ban working properly... :-(
> The loglines I want to catch look like this:
> > 2016-02-20T16:38:57.744887+00:00 hostname sshd[25454]: Invalid user
> > hugo from 2001:123:4567:2c1:fc53:64af:4c60:
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Dear All,
> I would really appreciate if you join one or more of @fail2ban/ teams on
> github and help out there. Since Fail2Ban is often used across
> platforms main developers have neither experience nor access to, it is
> hard
Dear All,
I would really appreciate if you join one or more of @fail2ban/ teams on
github and help out there. Since Fail2Ban is often used across
platforms main developers have neither experience nor access to, it is
hard to assess some issues and pull requests. We now have
following teams I wou
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015, Bond Masuda wrote:
> Thanks to Halchenko and others for replying to my initial message. I
> think I have enough understanding of fail2ban to make it useful for the
> included features.
> However, now I want to write custom filter and action. I think I
> understand that th
> > man fail2ban
> > and SEE ALSO within should guide you through the Fail2Ban ;)
> Thank you for updating. The yersion could also be marked as release at
> https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/releases
doh -- forgot that it needs to be explicitly marked as such there
done now for 0.9.3 -- THANK
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Bond Masuda wrote:
> New user of fail2ban. I currently have version 0.9.2 from the EPEL
> repository installed on my CentOS 6 system. I only see version 0.9.1 on
> the official website? Is this just because of update delays on the
> website or is the package from my repository
Dear All,
On behalf of everyone who contributed (and there were 12 people) to the
development of Fail2Ban since 0.9.2, I am proud to announce that
0.9.3 was tagged on GitHub, and uploaded to Debian sid. master branch is
ready to accept new PRs but you might need to re-merge master into it or re
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Sean DuBois wrote:
> > A question for you: Why does the tool monitor the fail2ban log? Why not
> > design it as an action which could be added to the existing actions for
> > a jail?
> > >i know there are other ideas out there for this need, but zeromq looked
> > >ap
Great ad you are welcome
cheers,
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, William Lewis wrote:
>A big "Thank You" to Yaroslav for pointing me to double check my REGEX
>expression. He was wondering if something in it was chopping off the last
>digit of the IP Address from the logs. I didn't know it was
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, William Lewis wrote:
>Hello:
>Problem #1:
>I just updated my Fail2Ban to version: 0.8.13.-1-nd12.04+1 from the Neuro
>Dabian repository and now I see that when Fail2Ban detects a match to one
>of my Jails, fail2ban erroneously drops the last digit off th
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Tony Evans wrote:
>Sorry, bad form on my part...
>Linux MyCloud 3.18.11+ #781 PREEMPT armv6l GNU/Linux
>fail2ban Installed: 0.8.6-3wheezy3
uff... sorry man -- that has been a while since that version -- very
many things were fixed and even though I don't recall
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015, Tony wrote:
>Hi
>When a ban occurs on my server, an email is being sent to the banned ip
>@domain.com, for example 45.13.2...@gmail.com.
>I have trawled through the settings but cant see how this is happening. I
>have checked ssmtp and alias settings also.
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, leftyfb wrote:
> fail2ban 0.9.1-1 is the current version in the latest release of Ubuntu
> (15.04). You could add the universe repo to whatever version you're
> running and only install fail2ban from it.
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/vivid/fail2ban
FWIW we have 0.9.2 now and
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, William Lewis wrote:
>Is there anyone who has the latest edition of Fail2Ban that can put it on
>the Ubuntu Repository?
>The latest edition now on the repository is version
>0.8.6-3wheezy3build0.12.04.1
I ship backports of 0.8 series from stock NeuroDebian:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Michael Grant wrote:
>I'm running Debian Jessie (actually Testing).A I have another machine
>that's still running fail2ban 0.8.13.A Here's a status from that machine
>but it's not exactly the same usage so the difference could definitely be
>that:
do you th
On Sat, 02 May 2015, Johannes Weberhofer wrote:
> Dear Yaroslav!
> Thank you for tagging the release. It would be great if you could mark the
> tag as Release in Github and add your changelogs!
only for you and only today -- done ;)
no adding of changelog was needed since I included them int
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> + ./fail2ban-testcases-all --no-network
> Testing using /usr/bin/python2.7
> Fail2ban 0.9.2 test suite. Python 2.7.9 (default, Apr 15 2015, 12:08:00)
> [GCC 5.0.0 20150319 (Red Hat 5.0.0-0.21)]. Please wait...
> ...
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Michael J. Campbell wrote:
>Hi!
>I've installed fail2ban, using the provided setup.py.
>As I want to use fail2ban from the debian repository instead of the
>previously installed one, I assumed it would be best practice to remove
>the current installation.
Dear All,
On behalf of everyone who contributed (and there were 17 people) to the
development of Fail2Ban since 0.9.1, I am proud to announce that
0.9.2 was tagged on GitHub, and uploaded to Debian sid. master branch is
ready to accept new PRs but you might need to re-merge master into it or re
sounds like a systemd library issue and our fix for it past 0.9.1:
commit 6dfddbcdf62553d56483d4990e84261845f46508
Author: Serg G. Brester
Date: Fri Nov 7 01:21:38 2014 +0100
Bug fix in formatJournalEntry, gh-851
Unhandled exception in fail2ban 0.9.1 #851
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Steve Murphy wrote:
>This is on 0.8.8 (I know, I know, it's *OLD* )
>We upgraded to Centos6.6 (which uses 0.8.8), which
>seems quite *NEW* to *us*.
> ...
>a**Has anyone noted this kind of behavior? Is it normal? Is it fixed in a
>later version?
0.8.8 --
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Ivan Demkovitch wrote:
>Hello list!
>I setup postfix to use Amazon SES for relaying SMTP mail. Amazon requires
>to a**verifya** sender email, which is fine. So, in my jail.local I have
>exactly what I need:
>sender = verifiedu...@mydomain.net
I don't thin
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Jānis wrote:
> Hi!
> I hope it is trivial problem:
> I installed v 0.9.1 and after some fiddlig got to the point where
> fail2ban "pretends" to be working - it follows maillog, places bans
> and unbans, but these actions seems not reaching iptables - iptables
> -L do
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, AJ Weber wrote:
> I'm using v0.8.14. Is there any way to do this or is there a way to
> "trick" fail2ban to do so (I tried "touching" one of the old log files,
> but fail2ban still doesn't seem to re-read that file to ban ips).
0.9. series uses a persistent database to st
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > how do you run such a minimal set without those executables? I am still
> > missing the point I guess (hope to get it to see if I need to do smth
> > like that for debian pkg). I could see how someone could have a
> > package with fail2ban-server
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/14/2015 03:43 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Feb 2015, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>> As I saied, uninstall fail2ban, delete /ect/fail2ban, than reinstall the
> >>> epel package, and tell
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > As I saied, uninstall fail2ban, delete /ect/fail2ban, than reinstall the
> > epel package, and tell me what you have in /etc/fail2ban.
> > You should have nothing apart the action.d folder.
> > As I saied, the package is broken.
> The files are in
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015, Davide Perini wrote:
> When I start fail2ban I can see this error now:
> Feb 06 22:10:21 netstar.acme.org fail2ban.actions[850]: NOTICE
> [ssh-iptables] Unban xx.xx.xx.xx
> Feb 06 22:10:21 netstar.acme.org fail2ban.action[850]: ERROR iptables -D
> fail2ban-SSH -s xx.xx.xx.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Steven Jones wrote:
> Hi,
> I seem to have some brute force root attacks beating fail2ban,
> Just as a selection, these are clearly more than 5 failures, hundreds get
> through over night,
> Have I missed a setting? or something else?
don't "steal" the unrelated thread
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Yves wrote:
> You're right of course, and I always try and contribute where and when I
> can. I did what I could and wrote down my experience:
> http://yalis.fr/cms/index.php/post/2014/11/02/Migrate-from-DenyHosts-to-Fail2ban
Lovely -- thanks for sharing. Posted it on fail2
and Fail2Ban Users community. So happen you use G+ -- express yourself
there.
https://plus.google.com/b/100687954024121389562/communities/116239755221726938303
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> https://plus.google.com/100687954024121389562/posts
> Add to your circles,
https://plus.google.com/100687954024121389562/posts
Add to your circles, spread the word ;)
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Research Scientist,Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hal
Dear All,
On behalf of everyone who contributed (and there is over 30 people!!!)
to the development of Fail2Ban since 0.9.0, I am proud to announce that
0.9.1 was tagged on GitHub, and uploaded to Debian sid
I have also uploaded a limited set of builds to -devel repository of the
NeuroDebian h
doh -- thanks Darac -- I have just misread original report as if
whois program was missing ;) indeed... nothing to be done on fail2ban
side really (besides creating some wrapper which would loop until it
succeeds)
Cheers,
On Fri, 03 Oct 2014, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:13:2
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> > just install whois program
> >> On a fairly recent installation of Fail2Ban v0.8.14 on CentOS 6.5,
> >> everything seems fine *except* occasionally my notification email
> *occasionally* - which means most of the time it works fine: `whois`
> is i
just install whois program from whatever package provides it (whois
package on debian systems)
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> On a fairly recent installation of Fail2Ban v0.8.14 on CentOS 6.5,
> everything seems fine *except* occasionally my notification email
> will include somet
awesome
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Sean DuBois wrote:
> INSTALLING
> --
> I am working on getting both projects in the Debian repos right now (and
> would appreciate help if anyone is involved with Debian!) You can get an
I am involved and would be glad to mentor/sponsor your uploads... can't
p
ikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links
>[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section
>And I removed the warning signs, if they still have something to complain,
>they will post them again.
>On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
42 matches
Mail list logo
