Re: [Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-16 Thread Nick Howitt
On 16/07/2021 01:00, James Moe via Fail2ban-users wrote: On 7/13/21 11:59 AM, Nick Howitt wrote: Suricata is a Snort alternative. If it is anything like Snort, it can be configured to be inside or outside the firewall. In ClearOS, it is outside the firewall but I assume for other distros it

Re: [Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-15 Thread James Moe via Fail2ban-users
On 7/13/21 11:59 AM, Nick Howitt wrote: > Suricata is a Snort alternative. If it is anything like Snort, it can be > configured to be inside or outside the firewall. In ClearOS, it is > outside the firewall but I assume for other distros it is user configurable. > I am not clear what you mean

Re: [Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-13 Thread Nick Howitt
On 13/07/2021 19:25, James Moe via Fail2ban-users wrote: On 7/13/21 12:34 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: Please post full configuration if you're not sure what to look for. I have no idea what 'suricata' is though Suricata is an Intrusion Detection/Prevention Software. Suricata is a Snort al

Re: [Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-13 Thread James Moe via Fail2ban-users
On 7/13/21 12:34 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > Please post full configuration if you're not sure what to look for. I > have no idea what 'suricata' is though > Suricata is an Intrusion Detection/Prevention Software. [ jail ] [suricata-1] enabled = true logpath = /data01/var/log/suricat

Re: [Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-13 Thread maillist . fail2ban
Hi, You are thinking to close by ban people out. I, for myself runing a jail named "info-apache" which triggers on access to the file "robots.txt". action isn't to ban out these ip's, there f2b only sending a mail using some greped infos from the log. So i can see which bots, how often take a

Re: [Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-13 Thread Nick Howitt
It can also happen if you are detecting responses, e.g. with SMTP, if you are detecting messages like "Lost connection from " messages these can apear up to about 3 minutes after the initial contact was made so, for example if someone makes 10 connection attempts which get lost, your ban ma

Re: [Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-13 Thread Tom Hendrikx
Hi, Apparently the ip-address 'should' be banned according to fail2ban's internal administration, but there is still activity coming in, triggering new bans. This can happen if your banning technique is broken, the configuration is broken, etc. F.i. you could configure the apache jail to b

[Fail2ban-users] "Already banned" makes no sense

2021-07-12 Thread James Moe via Fail2ban-users
fail2ban v1.0.1.1 opensuse tumbleweed, linux v5.13.0 Messages as shown below occasionally are in the log. It does not make much sense. If the IP is banned, how can it be detected in the target log? 2021-07-11 16:15:31,136 fail2ban.filter [10710]: INFO[suricata-1] Found 65.205.231.167