--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > Everybody
> > > Loves to see
> > > Justice done
> > > On somebody else
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" wrote:
> >
> > --"The universe is perfect". Only in an Absolute sense; but we
are
> > talking about relative matters. The universe is perfect,
imperfect,
> > and
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of dhamiltony2k5
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:37 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Last post
>Seems most of the authors from Fairfield who used to
post commentary are off FFL. Seems is
Whatever happens, I just hope the people of this country are not as
ignorant and retarded in their politics, as they have been, since who
knows when.
It is true when they get scared they will vote for what's familiar,
And they will get scared a lot before this is over.
I felt there was hope for a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --"The universe is perfect". Only in an Absolute sense; but we are
> talking about relative matters. The universe is perfect, imperfect,
> and all shades in-between. If the universe is solely "perfect", then
> it wou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > Everybody
> > Loves to see
> > Justice done
> > On somebody else
>
> That's really it, Barry. Jim avoids answering Angela's question
> because it hig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All that is is right. That is true for me, certainly,
> and always has been. Moreover, compassion is built
> into the structure of manifestation.
>
> That's all well and good, but it is another thing to
> say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Samuel Gravina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
> Goodbye Fairfield Life. I'm going to unsubscribe.
>
> I joined after Maharishi died and found out lots of interesting
> stuff. But the volume here is just too much. Plus I don't live
>in
> Fairfield, thou
The latest Gallup poll shows the presidentÂ’s approval
dropped to 28 percent, the lowest of his eight years
in office.
This is sad.
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Louis McKenzie wrote:
> > George W Bush is a nut case and anyone who would
> > say they will continue his
All that is is right. That is true for me, certainly,
and always has been. Moreover, compassion is built
into the structure of manifestation.
That's all well and good, but it is another thing to
say that those who suffer have deserved it. Language
matters. Words matter.
Another thing that m
How magnanimous of Hillary to withdrawObama cannot make Hillary his VP.
His life
depends on keeping HIllary off of his ticket.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> April 11, 2008
> Hillary Will Withdraw and Her Stature Soars (Brent Budowsky)
April 11, 2008
Hillary Will Withdraw and Her Stature Soars (Brent Budowsky)
@ 3:14 pm
Ignore everything you hear on cable talk shows. This is what will
happen, and why.
First, sometime between the days after the Pennsylvania primary and
the days after North Carolina and Indiana, Hillary Clin
I have a friend her name is Les she is a conservative.
She agrees that Bush is an idiot. She thinks
Hillary Clinton is a socialist marxist liar. She
thinks that Obama is uncertain and McCain is a nice
seasoned white man. She has already decided who she
is going to vote for. Bracuse McCain is a
Richard do you really believe what you are saying or
do you like playing devils advocate? How do you
spell McCain? BUSH GW BUSH AS A PERSON CAN NOT BE
PRESIDENT AGAIN BUT GEORGE BUSH POLITICS WILL CONTINUE
IF MCCAIN IS ELECTED. I doubt he will win because I
believe people will not be allowed t
On Apr 11, 2008, at 7:46 PM, Samuel Gravina wrote:
The other annoying thing is "Judy". I have no idea who "Judy" is
and have never seen a post by her. Granted I skip most of the
stuff that
doesn't get my interest quickly so maybe I've missed "Judy" but I
am continually presented with cr
On Apr 11, 2008, at 7:33 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Sal:
OK, Lurk, if that's really the case, how come they seem more than
ready to move on to what looks pretty similar and, maybein some
ways, even worse?
Sal, In the spirit of the season:
If he has simply been a senator from Arizon
On Apr 11, 2008, at 7:09 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Sal:
OK, Lurk, if that's really the case, how come they seem more than
ready to move on to what looks pretty similar and, maybe in some
ways, even worse?
Lurk:
Here's what I can't figure out. Most mainstream conservatives are
very
Goodbye Fairfield Life. I'm going to unsubscribe.
I joined after Maharishi died and found out lots of interesting
stuff. But the volume here is just too much. Plus I don't live in
Fairfield, though I have been an occasional visitor. Last time I was
there was last August. I really liked
I agree with Eckhart Tolle's observation that being
present in the now confers power and peace. Yet I
constantly find my awareness hijacked by thoughts
of past or future scenarios whose obvious purpose
is to inflate my ego. Why would I be subject to these
obviously fallacious mind states if I'
whoops sub "had" for "has" in the first two lines
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
> Most conservatives I know are embarassed by this administration
and
> are as anxious as the rest of us to move on to
lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Most conservatives I know are embarassed by this administration and
are as anxious as the rest of us to move on to something else.
Sal:
OK, Lurk, if that's really the case, how come they seem more than ready
to move on to what looks pretty similar and, maybein som
Louis McKenzie wrote:
> George W Bush is a nut case and anyone who would
> say they will continue his strategy is an absolute
> idiot.
>
Lewis, the election is over - Bush was re-elected,
get over it. There are NOT going to be any big changes
in U.S. goverment foreign policy. There's only one
> > ColdBlu wrote:
> > > ..with chemical weapons GW's daddy gave Saddam in the
> > > 80's when GHW Bush was Vice President.
> > >
> > There's no evidence that GW's daddy gave Saddam mustard
> > gas in the 80's.
>
ColdBlu wrote:
> ...that is inclusive of the US made sarin nerve agents
> GHW Bush
lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Most conservatives I know are embarassed by this administration and
are as anxious as the rest of us to move on to something else.
Sal:
OK, Lurk, if that's really the case, how come they seem more
than ready to move on to what looks pretty similar and, maybe
in some
did you not see that there was a massive shake up in
the intelligence agencies because they were being
blamed for the WMD mess but could not tell the 100%
truth because it would betray the President. They
told Bush there were no weapons. Bush did not want to
hear that. The chief inspector from
Drugs in the water.
There must be some heavy drugs in our water.
We as American people are so deep in fog that we can
not see the writing on the walls.
We push off any thing that shows our leaders for who
they have become.
Right now our world is on an axis. It can fall to one
side or the other
On Apr 11, 2008, at 6:03 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Most conservatives I know are embarassed by this administration and
are as anxious as the rest of us to move on to something else.
OK, Lurk, if that's really the case, how come they seem more
than ready to move on to what looks pretty s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > Thom Hartmann co-authored a book on the Kennedy assassination.
>
> I know he wrote a book on this. I have not read it.
>
> Have you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thom Hartmann co-authored a book on the Kennedy assassination.
I know he wrote a book on this. I have not read it.
Have you
> read it? I listen to Thom all the time and he is a bit on the fence
> about 9-11 too. He
--"The universe is perfect". Only in an Absolute sense; but we are
talking about relative matters. The universe is perfect, imperfect,
and all shades in-between. If the universe is solely "perfect", then
it would be incomplete, since completeness would require a degree of
imperfection.
The imp
I am watching this on you tube now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeY05iS5iv0&feature=related
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Louis McKenzie wrote:
> > After the use of poison gas in 1988 both the
> > United States and Britain began to supply Saddam
> > Hussein with even mor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just quoting lyrics, man. Here are some more:
>
Cool man-- glad you found someone else to follow around-- right on! Do
his CDs come with a leash?
Oh...and one for Sal too.
> Richard J. Williams wrote:
>> > > > Louis McKenzie wrote:
> > > > Saddam never had weapons of mass destruction no
> > > > chemical warfare ability none of what was stated.
> > > >
> > > Richard J. Williams wrote:
> > > So, how, exactly, did Saddam murder the Kurd women
> > > "with the babies
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:50 PM, sandiego108 wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> >>
> > The trouble with normal is it always gets worse
> >>
> >
> > Equating Universal Perfection with stagnat
Louis McKenzie wrote:
> After the use of poison gas in 1988 both the
> United States and Britain began to supply Saddam
> Hussein with even more chemical weapons.
>
There is no evidence that Britain or the United
States supplied poison gas or chemical weapons to
Iraq. If you can cite any evidence,
Louis McKenzie wrote:
> The Invasion of Iraq was based upon current
> intelligence reports current meaning post 2001.
>
The intelligence reports that were current in 2001
indicated that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.
That's why 97% of your congressional leaders voted
to authorize the presi
Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Published on Saturday, July 3, 2004 by the Inter Press
Service
Saddam Could Call CIA in His Defense
by Sanjay Suri
LONDON - Evidence offered by a top CIA man could
confirm the testimony given by Saddam Hussein at the
opening of his trial
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:35 PM, sandiego108 wrote:
>
> > A controversy has been created here in response to a question that
> > essentially questions why things are (Am I OK with children being
> > burned with white phosphorous?
On Apr 11, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Vaj wrote:
Strikes across the frontier and strikes for higher wage
Planet lurches to the right as ideologies engage
Suddenly it's repression, moratorium on rights
What did they think the politics of panic would invite?
Person in the street shrugs -- "Security comes
100 years in Iraq and an invasion of Iran will get the
ball rolling. WHY ARE WE EVEN THINKING ABOUT MCCAIN?
DO YOU REALLY TRUST THE REPUBLICANS? HAVEN"T THE
LAST EIGHT YEARS SHOWN YOU ANYTHING? I DO NOT
UNDERSTAND.
BY THE TIME Mc Cain is finished we will be in the war
to end all wars.
---
The Invasion of Iraq was based upon current
intelligence reports current meaning post 2001. The
weapons inspectors reported that he did not have any
WMDs but Bush's special home made intelligence said
that he did have. One thing I love about the
internet is all you have to do is go to Youtube or
On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:35 PM, sandiego108 wrote:
> A controversy has been created here in response to a question that
> essentially questions why things are (Am I OK with children being
> burned with white phosphorous? Is that perfection?). I initially
> made a statement that the world seen from a
On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:50 PM, sandiego108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The trouble with normal is it always gets worse
Equating Universal Perfection with stagnation, inertia, and inaction
is a hallmark of the ignorant mind, a mind lock
thats easy the weapons inspectors of both US and
England said he did not have. Yet just as when they
wanted you to believe that He has WMDs they did a
massive sell in this same way we assume we know the
story of the Kurds. We heard it on TV or CNN or any
news channels means what? You heard your
Bhairitu wrote:
> I guess this guy is one of Dr. Pete's paranoiacs:
>
> http://www2.nysun.com/article/74465?page_no=1
>
Maybe so. But when are you going to post some evidence
for a government conspiracy? We've all been waiting.
"And what are the chances that an operation of such
size--it would s
On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:56 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 3:40 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Yes, Bruce just nailed it. He does that. His
lyrics are perfect for *many* occasions. :-)
Here's another old song, written in 1981. That's
27 years ago, twenty years before 9/11. He nailed
it the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > The trouble with normal is it always gets worse
>
> Equating Universal Perfection with stagnation, inertia, and inaction
> is a hallmark of the igno
Louis McKenzie wrote:
> A VOTE FOR MCCAIN IS A VOTE FOR BUSH III
> A VOTE FOR McCAIN is a VOTE FOR THE INVASION OF IRAN
> A VOTE FOR MCCAIN IS A VOTE FOR ISRAEL's CONTINUED
> CONFLICT WITH PALESTINE.
>
> A VOTE FOR PEOPLE WHO VOTE IN SUPPORT OF BUSH ON GOING
> TO WAR IS QUESTIONABLE..
>
"...t
On Apr 11, 2008, at 3:40 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Yes, Bruce just nailed it. He does that. His
lyrics are perfect for *many* occasions. :-)
Here's another old song, written in 1981. That's
27 years ago, twenty years before 9/11. He nailed
it then, too. And, interestingly enough, he
nailed *now* t
> > Louis McKenzie wrote:
> > > Saddam never had weapons of mass destruction no
> > > chemical warfare ability none of what was stated.
> > >
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> > So, how, exactly, did Saddam murder the Kurd women
> > "with the babies in their arms" if he had no weapons
> > of mass
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
The trouble with normal is it always gets worse
>
Equating Universal Perfection with stagnation, inertia, and inaction
is a hallmark of the ignorant mind, a mind locked in duality. Dynamic
universal perfection is a co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > Everybody
> > Loves to see
> > Justice done
> > On somebody else
>
> That's really it, Barry. Jim avoids answering Angela's question
> because it
> > Karma, for me, encompasses the action/reaction part
> > of nature, and sometimes this matches up with what
> > we think is poetic or moral, but I don't think nature
> > holds itself to our standards of just deserts.
> >
Sal wrote:
> Of course it doesn't. Any attempt to make it conform
> is
A controversy has been created here in response to a question that
essentially questions why things are (Am I OK with children being
burned with white phosphorous? Is that perfection?). I initially
made a statement that the world seen from an enlightened perspective
is perfect; everyone gets ex
> > > Louis McKenzie wrote:
> > > Saddam never had weapons of mass destruction no
> > > chemical warfare ability none of what was stated.
> > >
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> > So, how, exactly, did Saddam murder the Kurd women
> > "with the babies in their arms" if he had no weapons
> > of mas
bailey wrote:
> I found Bamford's book helpful:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Pretext-War-Americas-Intelligence-
> Agencies/dp/B000C25WQS/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?
> ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207935493&sr=1-2
>
> Without going down the govt complicity path, Bamford
> shows you how mucked up the various agencies
Curtis wrote:
> Brilliant song!
>
Maybe so, but there is no 'justice'. If there were such
a thing all wrongs could be righted. Good people wouldn't
have bad things happen to them and if there was a justice,
then good things would always happen to good people.
Justice concerns the proper ordering
Curtis wrote:
> Since no one experiences karmic law directly, it is
> another dusty old theory from a culture who didn't even
> understand the circulation of blood.
>
Jump off a cliff, Curtis, and you will experience karma
directly, because karma means cause and effect, the first
law of thermodyn
I guess this guy is one of Dr. Pete's paranoiacs:
WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to
monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role
neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks.
On March 26, Richard Falk, Mi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 11:48 AM, sandiego108 wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you feel comfortable in asserting that, for
> >> example, children being burned
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Everybody
Loves to see
Justice done
On somebody else
That's really it, Barry. Jim avoids answering Angela's question
because it highlights so well his own callousness and
sense of entitlement.
Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Louis McKenzie wrote:
> > Saddam never had weapons of mass destruction no
> > chemical warfare ability none of what was stated.
> >
> So, how, exactly, did Saddam murder the Kurd women
> "with the babies
"The ten factors" are components of karma (as cause and effect).
Such laws may be viewed as analogous to ordinary physical laws such
as gravity (but of course, the 10 factors include all realms -
physical and non-physical). Terms such as "deserve" don't enter into
the equation since this woul
Brilliant song!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > > You claimed things are going along just perfectly, that everyone
> > > gets what they "deserve," and that that's karma, bab
A VOTE FOR MCCAIN IS A VOTE FOR BUSH III
A VOTE FOR McCAIN is a VOTE FOR THE INVASION OF IRAN
A VOTE FOR MCCAIN IS A VOTE FOR ISRAEL's CONTINUED
CONFLICT WITH PALESTINE.
A VOTE FOR PEOPLE WHO VOTE IN SUPPORT OF BUSH ON GOING
TO WAR IS QUESTIONABLE..
--- aztjbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---Thanks for the interesting quotes!!. The topic of karma is dealt
with in the Lotus Sutra and is broken down into the 10 "Nyo Ze's"
which I will post next. Terms such as "deserve" are anthropocentric
connotations imposed on a set of mechanical (though unfathomable)
laws. Karma may be seen as
He only had what the US gave him to do a specific job
he was told to get rid of and the weapons inspectors
got rid of anything he did have. In other words he
cooperated with the US and then when they were certain
he did not have anymore they F'ed him.
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You claimed things are going along just perfectly, that everyone
> > gets what they "deserve," and that that's karma, baby. Angela
> > asked, quite reasonably, if you then believed that children that
> > s
> Richard J. Williams wrote:
>
> > Louis McKenzie wrote:
> > Saddam never had weapons of mass destruction no
> > chemical warfare ability none of what was stated.
> >
> So, how, exactly, did Saddam murder the Kurd women
> "with the babies in their arms" if he had no weapons
> of mass destruct
On Apr 11, 2008, at 1:04 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
This inherent cruelty and victimizing the victim is really at the core
of karmic theory. Since no one experiences karmic law directly, it is
another dusty old theory from a culture who didn't even understand the
circulation of blood. (hint: t
OK, and can you fully accept the destruction of both the u.s. and
countries in the middle east? Can the u.s. people accept the
destruction of this country, the currency it uses to value its
labor, the borders it uses to define itself, its moral compass, its
families?
Do you mind if all this vi
On Apr 11, 2008, at 12:53 PM, ispiritkin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
You claimed things are going along just perfectly,
that everyone gets what they "deserve," and
that that's karma, baby. Angela asked,
quite reasonably, if you then believed that
children
Louis McKenzie wrote:
> Saddam never had weapons of mass destruction no
> chemical warfare ability none of what was stated.
>
So, how, exactly, did Saddam murder the Kurd women
"with the babies in their arms" if he had no weapons
of mass destruction and no chemical weapons?
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:04 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
You claimed things are going along just perfectly, that everyone gets
what they "deserve," and that that's karma, baby. Angela asked,
quite reasonably, if you then believed that children that suffered
horrible fates were getting what they
Angela Mailander wrote:
> > Do you feel comfortable in asserting that, for
> > example, children being burned by white phosphorus is
> > what they deserved? Do you think that feelings such
> > as that may incur their own karma?
> >
Sandiego wrote:
> What do you want out of this?
>
To start a fig
Bhairitu wrote:
> Thom Hartmann co-authored a book on the Kennedy
> assassination. Have you read it?
>
Not yet, maybe later.
'Crossfire'
The plot that killed Kennedy
by Jim Marrs
Carroll & Graf, 1993
http://tinyurl.com/6bc86l
"The Plot That Killed Kennedy, published in 1989,
still offers, i
We all have the John wayne cowboy attitude. I have
and it has cost me. Yet I think it is part of being
American.
The John Wayne Attitude is colorless, it is what gang
bangers live by. In business I am one of the first
to want to hurt the enemy. That is what is meant by
doing sung yuma with
Not defensive just at a point where I may not be able
to post something that can be said to be anti Bush.
So yes. However not defensive Thanks as in I am glad
you liked it. Started to say depends who is asking.
Then I would be paranoid.
Yet it was to my friend George. Not in anyway
attacki
You claimed things are going along just perfectly, that everyone gets
> what they "deserve," and that that's karma, baby. Angela asked,
> quite reasonably, if you then believed that children that suffered
> horrible fates were getting what they deserve.
This inherent cruelty and victimizi
Bush had a vote give him full authority to invade any
country without the approval of the senate or the
house. Many democrats voted in favor. Bush has had
many votes on budget 87 billion here 87 billion there
both dems and repubs voted yes. So they have voted
in support of the President. If
Why so defensive Louis?
When asked if you were the author
your answer was "thanks".
I was simply trying to clarify.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does that make a difference to you
> --- satvadude108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Louis: So
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> You claimed things are going along just perfectly,
> that everyone gets what they "deserve," and
> that that's karma, baby. Angela asked,
> quite reasonably, if you then believed that
> children that suffered
> horrible fates were
I found Bamford's book helpful:
http://www.amazon.com/Pretext-War-Americas-Intelligence-
Agencies/dp/B000C25WQS/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?
ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207935493&sr=1-2
Without going down the govt complicity path, Bamford shows you how
mucked up the various agencies were/are. Draw your own conclu
Wiki:
Pine nut oil has drawn recent attention for its medicinal properties.
According to a study by Lipid Nutrition, the pinolenic acid contained
in pine nut oil can help curb appetite by stimulating the release of
cholecystokinin, a hormone that functions as an appetite suppressant.
[3] The st
Does that make a difference to you
--- satvadude108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Louis: So you are taking credit for being the author
> of the "George" essay?
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > thanks. well the point is to be even consi
On Apr 11, 2008, at 11:48 AM, sandiego108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you feel comfortable in asserting that, for
example, children being burned by white phosphorus is
what they deserved?
Do you think that feelings such as that ma
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wvosteen" wrote:
> I think the main message is that all relative manifestations and
> actions are mixed. We can only judge for ourselves, not others.
That's the message for me!
I was not the only one to call my guru a "guru". He was modest and
always shr
Louis: So you are taking credit for being the author of the "George" essay?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thanks. well the point is to be even considering the idea of voting for
> anyone who even
thinks in the smallest way that Bush's polic
Louis McKenzie wrote:
> The republicans have gone to some place no human
> being in 2008 should ever consider going.
>
WASHINGTON - Republican Sen. John McCain has erased
Sen. Barack Obama's 10-point advantage in a head-to-head
matchup, leaving him essentially tied with both Democratic
candi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you feel comfortable in asserting that, for
> example, children being burned by white phosphorus is
> what they deserved?
> Do you think that feelings such as that may incur
> their own karma?
>
What would
Yes, the problem is that for anyone born between, say, the late 40's
on up into the early 80's a very noble, honorable picture of this
country's character was presented through the establishment media. A
kind of John Wayne, "we are the good guys always" presentation.
The truth is far different,
Thom Hartmann co-authored a book on the Kennedy assassination. Have you
read it? I listen to Thom all the time and he is a bit on the fence
about 9-11 too. He may not like name calling, which some of us find
funny, but does like to make jokes about BushCo and Republicans. That's
one of the
Do you have any basis for thinking that the "possibility" that the Bush
administration was complicit in 9-11 absurd? If you believe they are
too incompetent as some have said on FFL what about Al Qaeda? They're
more competent? What about the probable lie that 19 Arab terrorists
armed with b
I found it a nice work too. Bush is a sociopath and they don't feel
anything about killing others. It is theorized that he started out in
life this way after he somehow felt responsible for his sister's death
when he was a kid. Other sociopaths like Cheney and company are using
him. It is a ver
Do you feel comfortable in asserting that, for
example, children being burned by white phosphorus is
what they deserved?
Do you think that feelings such as that may incur
their own karma?
--- sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno"
> <[EMAI
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --"Inheriting the Earth" from a complete Biblical perspective
> emphasizing certain passages in Isaiah and then getting into the
> concept of Resurrection, elimination of all diseases, and including
> material abu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> With all due respect, what you guys are talking about
> with your "The meek shall inherit the earth" stuff is
> a sense of ENTITLEMENT, not ENLIGHTENMENT.
>
The enlightened aren't entitled to shit. They "inherit"
> n
Nostradamus marked this president as being known as the worst president of this
country ever. He also said that he would be the destruction of the US and the
democratic society, So there you have the current economic status the present
world opinion of our country and the dollar and banking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ispiritkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > Swami Rama of the Himalayas said an interesting
> > thing about people who had a need to self-medicate
> > with alchohol or other substances. He felt that
> > t
Skull and Bones I just read of an initiation process that may have been at the
cause of the death of JFK jr. I found that hard to believe. I have not gone
as far as saying that George Bush actually planned 911 although I do believe he
was part of the planning. It is record that he knew that
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
