--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's just that you can't really settle the
pragmatic issues if solipsism is theoretically
possible.
I'm not sure it was ever intended to be used as an actual
possibility though.
The point is that you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
It's just that you can't really settle the
pragmatic issues if solipsism is theoretically
possible.
I'm not sure it was ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
It's just that you can't really settle the
pragmatic issues if solipsism is theoretically
possible.
I'm not sure it was ever
why not slide down the slope? where would it lead you?
That's what philosophical inquiry does. I think you are using this
term in the context of Eastern philosophy where it is really a poor
transplant as a concept IMO. You can use this term almost like
poetry, but it was not meant as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
It's just that you can't really settle the
pragmatic
Developmental psychologists commonly believe that infants are
solipsist, and that eventually children infer that others have
experience much like theirs and reject solipsism. Solipsists assert
that this rejection is not logically justified.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
What do you suppose this is?
I reckon one of those new aurura spy planes, they apparently
do some weird exhaust patterns.
Lol, some spy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
It's just that you can't really settle the
pragmatic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
http://www.mensvogue.com/magazine/blogs/daily
Once you open it scroll down the page to a story about Fairfield,
written by Moby's accompanist.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1415 - Release Date: 5/5/2008
6:01 AM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why not slide down the slope? where would it lead you?
That's what philosophical inquiry does. I think you are using this
term in the context of Eastern philosophy where it is really a poor
transplant as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
It's just that you can't really settle the
pragmatic
NYT today
To manage the slowdown, Las Vegas is revving up an overseas marketing
campaign, and in the United States, it is pitching spontaneous Vegas
escapes. Do it without thinking! says one television spot.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why not slide down the slope? where would it lead you?
That's what philosophical inquiry does. I think you are using
this term in the context of Eastern philosophy where it is
really a poor transplant as a
Published on Sunday, May 4, 2008 by PBS.org
Beware The Simplifiers
by Bill Moyers
I once asked a reporter back from Vietnam, Who's telling the truth over
there? Everyone, he said. Everyone sees what's happening through the lens
of their own experience. That's how people see Jeremiah Wright. In
---Everybody knows that everything is inside the Mind of John
Malkovich. See it for yourself:
http://www.tinyurl.com/5fupne
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In
But brain researchers have discovered that when we consciously develop
new habits, we create parallel synaptic paths, and even entirely new
brain cells, that can jump our trains of thought onto new, innovative
tracks.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't have to have any reference to
enlightenment, nor is adopting it as an assumption
even necessarily pathological. It doesn't have to
change anything about how you interact with the
world; it just changes your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why is this guy not on national news every night like Wright?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qNi7tPanUA
Because McNuts has already clinched the Repub nomination -- later, if
it gets down to Mc v Obama, you
snip The concept was not created for that
purpose.
Curtis, I seriously doubt it was created for a
purpose, i.e., by philosophers as a conceptual
tool.
That sounds possible but its origin is presocratic so I don't know if
we can get to the bottom of it.
It's the sort of thing any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
It doesn't have to have any reference to
enlightenment, nor is adopting it as an assumption
even necessarily pathological. It doesn't have to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
It doesn't have to have any reference to
enlightenment, nor is
Yeah, I'm just interested in how you deal with it
in your Western context. Seems to me it's kinda
the elephant in the room in terms of what it says
about the nature of knowledge. It's like this huge
edifice of epistemology is missing its foundation.
I forgot to comment on this point which I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip The concept was not created for that
purpose.
Curtis, I seriously doubt it was created for a
purpose, i.e., by philosophers as a conceptual
tool.
That sounds possible but its origin is
If you leave the
door open a crack, maybe take a peek through from
time to time, you might one day see something
interesting. So I was just throwing it out there for
the heck of it.
It definitely launched me into a level of conceptual thinking that I
don't often hang out in. A much
One correlation is how some couples find that, in spite of their fears,
their relationship is recharged by an outside affair. Of course, any
deception involved necessarily reduces the beneficial effects.
--- new.morning wrote:
But brain researchers have discovered that
when we consciously
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Hugo richardhughes103@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@
wrote:
What do you suppose this is?
I reckon one of those new
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
