--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>
> Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
>
> When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible
way, it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
>
> Or I should say, those with whom you
It's pretty strange that you would have to ask, Share. But since you seem
confused:
The best possible outcome would be for you to take responsibility for having
said something incredibly insensitive and then apologize to the rest of us for
having tried to wiggle out of it before. You could a
And your interpretation is...? (Didn't you see my question?)
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken
seriously.
<< There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you are about
Barry. In fact, I'd say your a thousand-fold more distraught about Barry - in
fact, about seventeen years worth of distraught
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the
result you want?
Sharon, have you ever been raped or raped? Has your mother, your sister? If
they had been how would you like someone describing the rapists as "frisky
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
No, Share, I don't keep track or "rank" them. But I don't think I've ever
laughed so hard or so long at the abject cluelessness of one of your posts.
(This was just your clueless posts, BTW, not anyone else's. Yours are in a
class by themselves
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to
communicate with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has
another motive. Very strange.
I'll tell you what's strange and that's your segue into this next
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Oh, here you go, Share. Xeno just gave you a freebie. Make the most of it, OK?
<< Perhaps this is one of those cases of irony we have missed here, and
therefore, we should be deadly serious about what Richard says. Irony is best
used in small
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Perhaps this is one of those cases of irony we have missed here, and
therefore, we should be deadly serious about what Richard says. Irony is best
used in small doses, Robin's use of irony was quite extensive, and basically
used as a tool for m
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
On 12/26/2013 11:46 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
People who have been caught in falsehoods, as I pointed out not long ago, have
a tendency to misuse the term "lie" in the hope of making the person who caught
them look as ba
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
On 12/26/2013 1:05 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry!
You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd add to
your work. :-)
The most fascinating thing a
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
If their conversation was, as Judy and Robin claim, a "spoof", then both Judy
and Robin stand self-condemned. Most readers here take these messages at face
value, as being true. If Judy and Robin are spoofing us, then they stand as two
of the b
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
You've wasted another post on me, Bob - I hardly ever click on a YouTube link
if the poster can't spend the time posting a comment to go with it. What
exactly, are you trying to say? I'm sure it is interesting coming from you, but
I have bad ey
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Judy, your previous post indicates that you are keeping track of posts you
think are clueless and you're ranking them! I admit it makes me wonder about
your mental situation.
Yes, I would have to question this as well, Sharon. I mean, out o
One Hundred and Eighty Five.
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 12/21/13 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 12/28/13 00:00:00
805 messages as of (UTC) 12/27/13 00:07:23
158 Richard J. Williams
128 authfriend
79
Judy, what are you hoping to accomplish by bringing this up? What is the result
you want?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:58 PM, Share Long
wrote:
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to communicate
with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that
Nobody claimed you were a writer. Writers, write - ankle-biters, bite.
On 12/26/2013 1:44 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Oooopsie! Never claimed to be a writer.*
> It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum
> to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo
There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you are
about Barry. In fact, I'd say your a thousand-fold more distraught about
Barry - in fact, about seventeen years worth of distraught. 1996 - 2013.
Now that's being distraught!
On 12/26/2013 1:26 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote
A Tribute to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
by Edward Tarabilda
Maharishi is a disciple of the now deceased, former Shankaracharya of
North India, Swami Brahmananda Saraswati. This great swami was a Surya
Yogin, and one of the characteristics of a Surya Yogin is that he
teaches in a manner which causes
Chuck Berry
[image: Inline image 1]
Johnny B-Goode
http://youtu.be/rVT65M4mRnM
You Can't Catch Me - 1956
http://youtu.be/bcblXxc4oqo
Maybellene - 1955
http://youtu.be/LvKDr8AgvK8
Rock and Roll Music - Toronto, Canada - 1969
http://youtu.be/1U_hRhImaBU
Nadine
http://youtu.be/Cm8ktxzaumg
"Berr
And here's a British skinhead band, Sham 69, really belting it out. I saw this
band a lot back in the seventies. I don't think they ever got noticed in the
States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GQMIXGRjaw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GQMIXGRjaw
If Judy really thinks so badly of me, then why does she continue to communicate
with me?! It makes no sense and leads me to believe that she has another
motive. Very strange.
Anyway, Steve, how's the skiing? Are the villages looking beautiful?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 8:46 PM, "steve.
Re "The band consisted of Dave Edmunds (vocals, guitar) and Nick Lowe":
Now we're talking. Loved those two.
"I Knew the Bride", "I Hear You Knocking" and "Girls Talk" were some of my
favourites. If you like English (OK, Edmunds is Welsh) pub rock you should like
Dr Feelgood from the same p
Sure Judy, I wouldn't expect you to interpret it in any other way.
When there is an opportunity to frame something in the worst possible way,
it's pretty much guaranteed that you will be first in line.
Or I should say, those with whom you have a vendetta.
You may not realize it,,but
Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky
[image: Inline image 1]
1812 Overture - Leningrad Phil. Itzhak Perlman
http://youtu.be/cEkTZ5zlGRw
"Peterr Ilyich Tchaikovsky was a Russian composer whose works included
symphonies, concertos, operas, ballets, chamber music, and a choral setting
of the Russian Orthodox D
Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris:
"Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee
to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing
are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR ra
Rockpile
[image: Inline image 1]
Pet You And Hold You
http://youtu.be/1RT2-JdxV6Ie
Teacher Teacher - Live TV 1980
http://youtu.be/BpWCS-iFeDg
Heart - Billy Bremner
http://youtu.be/otoxobp6NUE
"Rockpile was a British rock and roll group of the late 1970s and early
1980s, noted for their strong
Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment.
And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in
the way they do.
Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 12/21/13 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 12/28/13 00:00:00
805 messages as of (UTC) 12/27/13 00:07:23
158 Richard J. Williams
128 authfriend
79 Share Long
64 awoelflebater
46 dhamiltony2k5
44 Bhairitu
32 TurquoiseB
28 s3r
Oh, here you go, Share. Xeno just gave you a freebie. Make the most of it, OK?
<< Perhaps this is one of those cases of irony we have missed here, and
therefore, we should be deadly serious about what Richard says. Irony is best
used in small doses, Robin's use of irony was quite extensive, an
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< > Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry!
You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd add to
your work. :-)
The most fascinatin
Perhaps this is one of those cases of irony we have missed here, and therefore,
we should be deadly serious about what Richard says. Irony is best used in
small doses, Robin's use of irony was quite extensive, and basically used as a
tool for manipulation.
On 12/26/2013 1:05 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work,
Barry!
*/You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd
add to your work. :-)
The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of
view, is
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< If their conversation was, as Judy and Robin claim, a "spoof", then both
Judy and Robin stand self-condemned. Most readers here take these messages at
face value, as being true. If Judy
If their conversation was, as Judy and Robin claim, a "spoof", then both
Judy and Robin stand self-condemned. Most readers here take these
messages at face value, as being true. If Judy and Robin are spoofing
us, then they stand as two of the biggest FFL fibbers of all time. All
true spoofs are
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
< < People who have been caught in falsehoods, as I pointed out not long ago,
have a tendency to misuse the term "lie" in the hope of making the person who
caught them look as bad as they do. You
On 12/26/2013 11:46 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*People who have been caught in falsehoods, as I pointed out not long
ago, have a tendency to misuse the term "lie" in the hope of making
the person who caught them look as bad as they do. You do this, Barry
does this, Richard does this. It's
On 12/26/2013 12:55 PM, obbajeeba wrote:
> Posting limits are for complainers.
Parodies are for posers.
You've wasted another post on me, Bob - I hardly ever click on a YouTube
link if the poster can't spend the time posting a comment to go with it.
What exactly, are you trying to say? I'm sure it is interesting coming
from you, but I have bad eyes these days.
On 12/26/2013 12:48 PM, bobpri...@y
No, Share, I don't keep track or "rank" them. But I don't think I've ever
laughed so hard or so long at the abject cluelessness of one of your posts.
(This was just your clueless posts, BTW, not anyone else's. Yours are in a
class by themselves. And this one almost rises to the level of the last
Perhaps you got sidetracked here on your way to this site:
http://www.debate.org/
On 12/26/2013 01:11 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Oh, nonsense, Bhairitu. There's no such rigid distinction as you
suggest. Sometimes discussions involve debates, sometimes not. There
have always been debates
Judy, your previous post indicates that you are keeping track of posts you
think are clueless and you're ranking them! I admit it makes me wonder about
your mental situation.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:19 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
I don't know whether anyone's keeping t
Even weaker. Of course you didn't "realize" it. After all, if it were a
contest, you might lose.
<< Judy, I didn't realize it was a contest. Go figure! >>
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:06 PM, "authfriend@..."
wrote:
Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this?
<<
I don't know whether anyone's keeping track, Share. Would it make you anxious
if they were? After all, you'd only be competing with yourself.
<< Is someone keeping track?! That seems pretty clueless to me! >>
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:12 PM, "authfriend@..."
wrote:
This
Is someone keeping track?! That seems pretty clueless to me!
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:12 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
This is probably the funniest (i.e., most clueless) post Share has ever made.
<< from yahoo answers: Irony is probably one of the great misused words of ou
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
What is it with the MGC?! First Emily and Bob obsess on my reaction to Ann's
tree photo. Now Ann wonders about my reaction to Bob's writing! And once before
she wondered about my reaction to Judy and Bob's exchange about Pinter. If I'm
such a l
This is probably the funniest (i.e., most clueless) post Share has ever made.
<< from yahoo answers: Irony is probably one of the great misused words of our
generation. In its pure form it requires the speaker to say one thing and mean
another, and also requires at least one person present to
Judy, I didn't realize it was a contest. Go figure!
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:06 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this?
<< You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival
measures! Good job!
Of course you
from yahoo answers: Irony is probably one of the great misused words of our
generation. In
its pure form it requires the speaker to say one thing and mean another, and
also requires at least one person present to believe that the
speaker means what he says and at least one who knows otherwise.
Pretty weak, Share. Can't you do any better than this?
<< You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival
measures! Good job!
Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a
survival measure.
Judy, I think there have been many huge str
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
He was spoofing Barry and his buddies and their crazed attacks on me, and
also, yes, partly his own writing style. He did the latter quite a bit,
actually. Most people knew what he was doing, and it only enhanced his
credibility. He was a maste
You think this Judy because all of your strategies are your survival measures!
Good job!
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:41 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a
survival measure.
<< Judy, I think there have
Much better. It was just really funny that you made that particular typo while
blustering about how the standard keyboard never changes.
<< Does your keyboard have the "u" key instead of the "w" key next to the "q"
key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were "querty"
k
What is it with the MGC?! First Emily and Bob obsess on my reaction to Ann's
tree photo. Now Ann wonders about my reaction to Bob's writing! And once before
she wondered about my reaction to Judy and Bob's exchange about Pinter. If I'm
such a liar, etc., why would they be at all interested in my
Starting working already 3. January, that will unfortunately not be possible. I
have no idea of RajaRam plans for public teaching but he has held several
interesting new courses for Purusha.
Hope you are having a relaxing holiday Buck !
He was spoofing Barry and his buddies and their crazed attacks on me, and also,
yes, partly his own writing style. He did the latter quite a bit, actually.
Most people knew what he was doing, and it only enhanced his credibility. He
was a master at ironic self-deprecation. Too bad you missed it;
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
On 12/26/2013 11:09 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Does your keyboard have the "u" key instead of the "w" key next to the "q"
key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were "querty"
keyboards.
On 12/26/2013 11:14 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Robin and I called that exchange our "irony duel" in private.
Oh, so now it's "irony" instead of a "parody"?
parody:
a. A literary or artistic work that imitates the characteristic style of
an author or a work for comic effect or ridicule.
Richard, I was joking around. Ann finally posted a photo of this year's tree.
Emily and Bob did a great job of bringing all that about imho (-:
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:41 PM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
On 12/26/2013 10:58 AM, sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Richard, Ann's just
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple
slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by
your double standards.
I did no such thing, I was speaking very clearly.
On Thur
Celebrate New Year's Eve., Contra-style! We'll have a contra dance in the
ballroom at Morning Star Studio... but that's not all! There will be dancing
also in the Sunset Gallery, AND the beautiful Lounge is open to everyone. The
$5 door fee covers everything. Here are the details:
New Year's E
That other thread on Transitioning TM Leadership should proly go with this as
related.
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/368174
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/368174
Buck wrote:
Bringing Heaven on Earth:
On 12/26/2013 11:09 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does your keyboard have the "u" key instead of the "w" key next to the
"q" key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them
were "querty" keyboards.
Opsie...
Oh my Gawd! The Corrector caught me making a typo. This is
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
On 12/26/2013 10:58 AM, sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... wrote:
> Richard, Ann's just upset that I caught her trying to pass off last
> year's tree photo as this years! Plus I revealed her lie about my
> living in a 1 BR flat.
It's beg
Of course you think that, Share. You have to think that. I understand. It's a
survival measure.
<< Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and
your buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written. >>
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Sh
On 12/26/2013 10:58 AM, sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Richard, Ann's just upset that I caught her trying to pass off last
> year's tree photo as this years! Plus I revealed her lie about my
> living in a 1 BR flat.
It's beginning to look like we've got a pair of serial fibbers on FFL.
That's pr
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, wrote:
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break
between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons
at a community college. Thanks for the pos
Barry stopped dialoguing long ago with people who he knew had seen through him.
He's terribly intimidated by intelligent people.
<< Poor Barry was wildly, insanely jealous of Robin. Still is. Brings him up
at every opportunity even long after he's left. I've never seen Barry so
distraught by
On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a
parody. Go figure. I even have it documented in a private email
So, you are saying that Robin "spoofed" himself? Because a parody,
strictly speaking, is a work that caricatures
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
My question Buck, is what is 'quite fair enforcing a posting limit'? All you
have to do is make sure nobody posted over a specified limit, and lock them out
for the specified penalty. It is mechanical, fairness is not involved. From
your past s
Judy, I think there have been many huge stretches on the part of you and your
buddies to give nefarious interpretations to what I've written.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:38 PM, Share Long
wrote:
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple
slur. Y
Wonderful, inspiring story and movement, Rick, thank you for posting.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:24 PM, Rick Archer
wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qqqVwM6bMM
Inspiring 19-minute TEDTalk by the founder of an extraordinary school in India
that teaches rural women -- many of
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
More, um, wishful thinking from Barry. ;-)
<< The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of
view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then, both
of them are so clueless that they climbed all o
The point is that it's a huge stretch to claim Ann intended "slurs" on mentally
challenged people or Hispanics with accents. (And "slurs" on Richard are
eminently well deserved; he's made many more and far worse slurs on Ann and me.)
Your trivializing comment about would-be rapists, in contra
<< Your questions are dumb imo, Judy because you are asking me about something
that you yourself do. That is, you have no standards for your buddies and very
harsh standards for those you don't like. >>
No, no, Share, you've tried that before with me, and you came up empty,
remember? In fact
My question Buck, is what is 'quite fair enforcing a posting limit'? All you
have to do is make sure nobody posted over a specified limit, and lock them out
for the specified penalty. It is mechanical, fairness is not involved. From
your past statements here one can conclude you have more censor
Oh, nonsense, Bhairitu. There's no such rigid distinction as you suggest.
Sometimes discussions involve debates, sometimes not. There have always been
debates on FFL.
Of course FFL is NOT a debate group. It's a chat group. Maybe that is some
folks first mistake: discussion groups on the Int
Nablusoss1008,
Are you going to that course in Europe? Is Tony Nader going to be teaching
there? I hope he makes himself more available to the meditating community in
the New Year. It would be good. I would appreciate seeing him and hearing
more of his discourse directly.
-Buck
While I do not think posting will be reimposed, I liked the 50 post limit. But
I would give Richard an extra 50 per week as a bonus for his accomplishment.
Judy, this is how you don't face reality, the reality that Ann made a triple
slur. You dig up something that I said months ago. This is also what I mean by
your double standards.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:05 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
I seem to recall your referring to w
Your questions are dumb imo, Judy because you are asking me about something
that you yourself do. That is, you have no standards for your buddies and very
harsh standards for those you don't like.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:46 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
If you'll forgive
Of course FFL is NOT a debate group. It's a chat group. Maybe that is
some folks first mistake: discussion groups on the Internet are NOT
debate groups. Otherwise this would be FFD or Fairfield Debates. :-D
On 12/26/2013 11:17 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
It's also a sure sign of defeat in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qqqVwM6bMM
Inspiring 19-minute TEDTalk by the founder of an extraordinary school in
India that teaches rural women -- many of them illiterate -- to become solar
engineers, artisans, dentists and doctors in their own villages. It's called
the Barefoot College, and it
Meaningless in this context.
<< Richard is in tune with Maharishi who said that everything is important but
nothing is serious. >>
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:27 PM, "authfriend@..."
wrote:
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to
be taken
I seem to recall your referring to would-be Indian rapists as "frisky." IMHO,
that's about a ten-fer, all in one unbelievably insensitive remark.
But keep going, Share. I'm sure you're impressing Uncle Feste with your .great
integrity.
<< With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to sl
Kind of a shame you don't have the time to read even one of those emails to see
the directions for unsubscribing that are found on each and every one of them.
Because thanks to the glory that is the Neo interface, I get an error when I
try to unsubscribe you. So, you're SOL until you can figure
If you'll forgive me, Share, I hardly consider your opinion definitive on what
is dumb and what is not. I understand why you have to avoid the tough
questions, though. That's your modus operandi. You couldn't survive otherwise.
<< Judy, I answered one of your questions even though imo they're
Oooopsie! Never claimed to be a writer.
> It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum
> to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be
> posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting
> snarky messages all day and int
Yep, John, funny old world we're living in...
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:42 AM, "jr_...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
This guy claims to be the one. And some people believe him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfgnNHJ2zQc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>
> It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this
forum
> to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be
> posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting
> snarky mess
Judy, I answered one of your questions even though imo they're all pretty dumb.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
You didn't answer my questions. I guess they must be pretty threatening to you.
<< I support Richard because not only are his posts hum
Richard is in tune with Maharishi who said that everything is important but
nothing is serious.
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:27 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< You are mistaken
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum to
look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be posting
something interesting to read instead of wa
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< You are mistaken- Robin's post was not a parody; his post was true in all
respects. Judy is the only person I know of that thinks Robin's post was a
parody. If what Ann said was accurate,
More, um, wishful thinking from Barry. ;-)
<< The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of
view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then, both
of them are so clueless that they climbed all over themselves to see who could
kiss Robin's ass th
You have just become one of the CEOs, meaning Christmas and Easter Only.
no time for all the mail, folks, please unsubscribe me!
Thanks!
PS
Richard, didn't Maharishi say once that everything is important but nothing is
serious?
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
When did I ever say otherwise? And, how would you know, since you don't even
read my messages. Go figure.
On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< The only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me You
need to stop the lying, Ms Stein. For the record, Judy has been stalking me for
over a decade. The proof is in the arc
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
<< Maybe Barry was posting a parody. Judy is easily the target of a parody, as
Robin demonstrated. Apparently Judy will fall for any parody, even one by Robin
that looks like the truth. Go figur
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
