Fox was well ahead of his time, and probably the reason why although 
moderately successful in attracting large crowds, his Movement didn't become 
universally accepted as he had hoped.
 

 From Wikipedia:
 

 Rituals can be safely ignored, as long as one experiences a true spiritual 
conversion. The qualification for ministry is given by the Holy Spirit - 
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Spirit 
 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Spirit 
 
 Holy Spirit - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Spirit Holy Spirit 
or Holy Ghost is a term found in English translations of the Bible that is 
understood differently among the Abrahamic religions.[1][2] Holy Spirit is s...
 
 
 
 View on en.wikipedia.org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Spirit 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  
, not by ecclesiastical study. This implies that anyone has the right to 
minister, assuming the Spirit guides them, including women and children.[4] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Fox#cite_note-ingle-4 God "dwelleth in the 
hearts of his obedient people": religious experience is not confined to a 
church building https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_(building). Indeed, Fox 
refused to apply the word "church" to a building, using instead the name 
"steeple-house", a usage maintained by many Quakers today. Fox would just as 
soon worship in fields and orchards, believing that God's presence could be 
felt anywhere.[18] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Fox#cite_note-18 Though 
Fox used the Bible to support his views, Fox reasoned that, because God was 
within the faithful, believers could follow their own inner guide rather than 
rely on a strict reading of Scripture or the word of clerics.[4] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Fox#cite_note-ingle-4[19] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Fox#cite_note-19 Fox also made no clear 
distinction between Father, Son and Holy Spirit.[4] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Fox#cite_note-ingle-4 Religious Society of 
Friends[edit 
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Fox&action=edit&section=3] 

Reply via email to