On Feb 24, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Peter wrote:
Vaj, I love ya brother, but this just ain't true!!
--- On Thu, 2/24/11, Tom Pall <thomas.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Tom Pall <thomas.p...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Questions for Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, February 24, 2011, 9:52 PM
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Vaj <vajradh...@earthlink.net> wrote:
They believe the truth of what their saying, even if they only have
a sketch and are making the rest up, on the fly. One of the
disappointing stories on Mahesh is the story of how he would be
prepped by his students on abstract ideas, often by reading various
Sanskrit translations; all backstage, behind the curtain.
Could someone elaborate on Maharishi doing this? I know he spoke
with experts who "drew the knowledge" out of him. But do what is
described here really happen? Just how was Maharishi (trade mark)
Vastu or Maharishi (trade mark) Ayurveda developed? I was told
that experts drew the knowledge out of Maharishi's omniscience.
Not so?
Well, you're quoting Tom, not me, so I'm not sure what to say!
It's well known this actually occurred at Estes Park, as it was
observed directly by Mahesh's assistant. Unless you were part of the
inner circle that protected and coddled him, you'd never ever see
this. Behind the scenes could be very business-like, "let's sell
those mantras" and then once on stage with the cameras rolling, the
giggling one returned.
But Pete you've shared your own story about how a visiting vaidya's
lecture was so heavily edited as to no longer resemble what he was
actually saying -- and all in order to toe the line with the dictates
of Maheshism. The same information extraction and filtering was going
since the earliest daze.
There are numerous other first hand accounts other than Estes Park.
For more details, check out http://tmfree.blogspot.com/2007/01/mahesh-
and-lie.html
