--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Naw, I've been reading all the traffic here > from the beginning of the whole Raja thing, > and I haven't seen a word except the comments > about the wives not being named in the photos. > > I'm not even talking about the *political* > aspects; we've known about the TMO's, and > MMY's, sexism for decades. I'm talking about > the practical effect of the absence of the > feminine vibe among the Rajas in terms of > whatever effect *they're* supposed to have on > world consciousness. > > -----Actually I have made several points on this topic over the years. As a tantric I have felt obligated to point out that the Movement is mysogynistic in structure...
...Usually, but not always. For most of the eighties, the UK was run in reality by the Sidhi Administrator (more than by the National Leader)and the Centre Chairman for London was a woman. So so the boss of Scotland, another very successful area. This was the hay day of the movement. MMY's spreadsheets and teams of analysts should have spotted the correlation between success and the fair sex. Uns. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
