by Hyun Hee Lee http://features.cgsociety.org/newgallerycrits/g78/158578/158578_1172066142_large.jpg
Added bonus: Vern L. Bullough on "Science and Religion in Historical Perspective" in Science and Religion, edited by Kurtz; page 132-133: Jumping to the 13-th century wrt new translations of Aristotle made available in the West, Bullough points out that "...Albertus Magnus, St. Thomas Aquinas, and others Aristotelianized Christianity and Christianized Aristotle and other Greek scientific writings by incorporating them into their worldview and theology". ... "What is important, in my view, is taht by the middle of the 13-th century, Christian theology had come to be based on what could be regarded as the cutting edge of science at that time.". ... "The difficulty that this opposed to Christian theology is that science in its quest for answers is continually growing and changing, and while it is sometimes difficult to change scientific assumptions, those earlier scientific assumptions being challenged had often gained the status of dogma in theological writings". ... "The result is that [pursuant to Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler] the scientific theology of Thomas Aquinas and other Scholastics had been based on what had become outmoded assumptions. The idea of heaven up above and hell and purgatory and other places below had to be rethought, as did a large number of other doctrinal questions". ... [the author goes on to conclude that the problem is not with science, but with theology: "Why couldn't they just ignore scientific explanations and indicate that their belief is based on faith? The fact that they refuse to do so and claim that their biblical literalism is a science is what makes for antagonisms between religion and science".
