[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

Question for Rick and anyone else with as much history with the Movement as Rick: Any idea how many former TM Governors went out on their own and set themselves up as gurus - or at least as spiritual teachers promising something special? The ones I am aware of are: Bob Fickes, Robin Carlsen, A

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

Rick, you seem to have found a bit of evidence of Movement shenanigans when it comes at least to money, plus the Movement propensity for covering stuff up like Hagelin's hitting on his students, the recent firing of a faculty member for sexual and financial impropriety, yet you seem quite keen o

RE: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick Archer

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of shempmcgurk Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 12:11 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick Archer 2) the next SEVEN results, however, are all commercial sites that are

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick Archer

Rick, I ask the following questions because I understand you are in the search engine result-optimizer business (sorry if I am using an incorrect term to describe what your business is called, but you get the idea). When I do a Google search the results that come up seems to me to be listed in

RE: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

I was trying to be funny...oh well! --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Peter > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:29 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Fa

RE: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:29 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick On behalf of Rick, WTF is this? Rick also might have once beat his dog and kept his

Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

On behalf of Rick, WTF is this? Rick also might have once beat his dog and kept his grandmother locked in the attic! Is this a new age swiftboat attack? --- The Secret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rick, > > You might have once stated that there is a silent > witness within you. > May I ask if

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

Rick, You might have once stated that there is a silent witness within you. May I ask if this witness was there while you were going to the Dome before your trips to Mt. Pleasant or afterwards?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick on 9/17/06 1:53 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why can't your involvement with Amma be considered a religion? If it was, wouldn't that be the same as, say, being a Catholic...which would mean that the TMO couldn't hav

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

why can't your involvement with Amma be considered a religion? If it was, wouldn't that be the same as, say, being a Catholic...which would mean that the TMO couldn't have any objection to it? Where is the dividing line between a TMer giving another "saint" their business and practising a relig

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick (was: Re: Why the need???)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 8/14/06 5:15 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > , Rick Archer wrote: > >> > > > Well, if I can put it in the same f

Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick (was: Re: Why the need???)

Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick (was: Re: Why the need???) on 8/14/06 5:15 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, if I can put it in the same folder, of course that's wha

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick (was: Re: Why the need???)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 8/14/06 4:50 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Rick, oddly enough I posted this same question last night, > > but the post never made it to the Web site, so I assume > > you never saw it. > > > > I

Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick (was: Re: Why the need???)

Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick (was: Re: Why the need???) on 8/14/06 4:50 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick, oddly enough I posted this same question last night, but the post never made it to the Web site, so I assume you never saw it. I would like to add to the

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick (was: Re: Why the need???)

Rick, oddly enough I posted this same question last night, but the post never made it to the Web site, so I assume you never saw it. I would like to add to the Files section my commentary from alt.m.t on John Knapp's "Trancenet Alert" TM "crisis" series, one post of which gerbal has put in the TMO

Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

Don't worry, Rick. One day you'll see the error of your ways and beg for Bevan's forgiveness ;-) --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 7/29/06 1:10 AM, shempmcgurk at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Are you flying in the Dome for this special > get-together they are > > having? > > >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick on 7/29/06 1:10 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you flying in the Dome for this special get-together they are having? No. Do you want to? No. I’m not doing the Sidhi program these days. I did it for 25 years, largely out of a

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

Are you flying in the Dome for this special get-together they are having? Do you want to? Will they let you? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group

Re: [FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

on 5/9/06 3:09 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the "Photos" section you have posted two photos of > MMY's "girlfriends". > > What I find interesting is that you named both of them -- fully -- > both first and last name. > > Isn't that something new on your part?  If I remembe

[FairfieldLife] Question for Rick

In the "Photos" section you have posted two photos of MMY's "girlfriends". What I find interesting is that you named both of them -- fully -- both first and last name. Isn't that something new on your part?  If I remember correctly, in earlier references that you have made to both of them t