[FairfieldLife] Re: A project for several weaks?

2005-12-07 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shankara's comment on BS 2.1.3 etena yogaH pratyuktaH..2.1.3.. By this [?by refuting saankhya, also] yoga is refuted. yogapratyuktyadhikaraNam..2.1.3.. etena sAMkhyasmRtipratyAkhyAnena, yogasmRtirapi

[FairfieldLife] Re: A project for several weaks?

2005-12-06 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shankara's comment on BS 2.1.3 satISvapyadhyAtmaviSayAsu bahvISu smRtiSu sAMkhyayogasmRtyoreva nirAkaraNe yatnaH kRtaH; More guessing, just for fun: In the existing (satiiSu [api]) several (bahviiSu) smritis

[FairfieldLife] Re: A project for several weaks?

2005-12-06 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shankara's comment on BS 2.1.3 satISvapyadhyAtmaviSayAsu bahvISu smRtiSu sAMkhyayogasmRtyoreva nirAkaraNe yatnaH kRtaH; More