I didn't say they were "wrong." They didn't make any actual claims; how could
they? There's no evidence she did anything corrupt.
No, they're satisfied with heaps of nasty innuendo. That's how the right wing
operates.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 08/25/2016 12:23 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Gee, too bad there's no evidence of corruption, isn't it?
And too bad the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall
Street Journal (!) have all said there was no evidence of conflict of
interest.
FWIW, Arkansas
Gee, too bad there's no evidence of corruption, isn't it?
And too bad the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street
Journal (!) have all said there was no evidence of conflict of interest.
FWIW, Arkansas Online is the Web version of the right-wing Arkansas
Democrat-Gazette,