But scientists are
worried, nonetheless of the future possibilities of machines.
http://www.thelocal.se/19120.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
John wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in
nanoseconds. But at the present state of technology,
it can't think and understand the meaning of, I think,
therefore I am. But scientists are
Unchallenged (that is, assumed as true without even
citing a source for them) assumptions in John's posts
this morning on the possibilities of machine consciouness:
* Consciousness is much more complicated than what you
propose. The entity in question should be able to distin-
guish and choose
John wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
John wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds. But at the
present state of technology, it can't think and understand the meaning of,
I think, therefore I am. But
TurquoiseB wrote:
His view was that if the design were good
enough, there would be no way that a
cybernetic organism could tell itself from
a human organism...
Actually, in Phillip K. Dick's world, the humans
couldn't tell the difference between replicants
and themselves. Replicants already
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
John wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
John wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds. But at
the present state of technology, it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds.
But at the present state of technology, it can't think and
understand the meaning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds.
But at the present state of technology, it can't think and
understand the meaning of, I think, therefore I am. But
scientists are worried, nonetheless of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
To All:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds. But at
the present state of technology, it can't think and understand the
meaning of, I think, therefore I am. But scientists are worried,
nonetheless of the
On Jul 26, 2009, at 4:51 PM, davidpalmer108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds. But
at the present state of technology, it can't think and understand
the meaning of, I think,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
HH the Dalai Lama...
This lama is now presenting himself as His Highness ? Or is this simply the
fantasies of the Vaj ?
If he is so high, why can't he free Tibet even after all these years ?
Probably because he is nothing
On Jul 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
HH the Dalai Lama...
This lama is now presenting himself as His Highness ? Or is this
simply the fantasies of the Vaj ?
His Holiness. He's been known as that for many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, davidpalmer108 davidpalmer...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds. But at
the present state of technology, it can't think and understand the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Jul 26, 2009, at 4:51 PM, davidpalmer108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds. But
at the present state of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozg...@... wrote:
John wrote:
To All:
Machines can play chess, and compute equations in nanoseconds. But at the
present state of technology, it can't think and understand the meaning of,
I think, therefore I am. But scientists are
17 matches
Mail list logo
