Re: [FairfieldLife] Re :Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread Vaj
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re :Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin Beautiful! Or she could be testing to see who’s ready for total identification with Ma... I will post them if I have time later, there are entire groups of sadhus who dress as women as part of their sadhana. On 10/3/05 4:55

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re :Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re :Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin on 10/3/05 3:46 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Smile, it’s alright. Transvestites are sacred—esp. to those worshipping the goddess, as it’s the perfect way for them to complete their identification with Her. It’s the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re :Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread Vaj
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re :Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin Smile, it’s alright. Transvestites are sacred—esp. to those worshipping the goddess, as it’s the perfect way for them to complete their identification with Her. It’s the fault of western repressive mores that we don’t welcome

[FairfieldLife] Re :Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread Jason Spock
airfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin   Ramana Maharshi committed indiscretions?? Oh, really?  Ramana was a man dressing as a woman,or a woman dressing as a man?     From: "Vaj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:01:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife]

[FairfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ramana used to dress to appear as a women--most likely as part of his > sadhana. Transvestites are sacred to the Goddess and a welcome sight to > bless weddings in India. In my understanding they are rather transgender people

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread Vaj
On 10/3/05 10:08 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ramana used to dress to appear as a women--most likely as part of his >> sadhana. Transvestites are sacred to the Goddess and a welcome sight >> to bless weddin

[FairfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ramana used to dress to appear as a women--most likely as part of his > sadhana. Transvestites are sacred to the Goddess and a welcome sight > to bless weddings in India. > > The original post should have had an obligatory smi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread Vaj
Ramana used to dress to appear as a women--most likely as part of his sadhana. Transvestites are sacred to the Goddess and a welcome sight to bless weddings in India. The original post should have had an obligatory smiley. On 10/3/05 9:19 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In Fai

[FairfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, not really. In western terms he was a transvestite. Oh, really? Ramana was a man dressing as a woman, or a woman dressing as a man? > On 10/3/05 8:14 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In Fairfiel

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread Vaj
Well, not really. In western terms he was a transvestite. On 10/3/05 8:14 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Maybe this was just to cover his own indiscretions? > > Ramana Maharshi committed indiscretions?? -

[FairfieldLife] Re: Cannot Judge - Maharishi or Hagelin

2005-10-03 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe this was just to cover his own indiscretions? Ramana Maharshi committed indiscretions?? > On 10/2/05 7:21 AM, "Jason Spock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hari Om, > >