--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So now it's not just BuzzFlash bringing up in February this > contemptible right wing attack style tactic by the Clinton > campaign.
Obama has been attacking Clinton from the right since September. Take the quiz: http://www.hillaryclinton.com/feature/quiz/?sc=8 <snip> > I don't recall a note from an ardent supporter of Clinton > deploring the Senator's tactics. There is some emotional > blind attachment to the idea that a woman in the White House > would change things, even if she is behaving in this campaing > more like Karl Rove than Eleanor Roosevelt. If Karl Rove were > Karla Rove would that make his methods suddenly "feminist" > and worthy of support by the "Clinton sisterhood"? <snort> Of course, the only reason women have for supporting Clinton is because she's female. > Glory be, we hope not. > > The bottom line is that Clinton's right wing smear campaign > tactics have forced many supporters of the positive nurturing, > embracing qualities of Feminism down into the gutter with a > flawed candidate, whose gender is secondary to his thirst for > power. "HIS thirst for power"? Freudian slip, perhaps? It's now been corrected to "the candidate's thirst for power," but that was a pretty funny typo (which Sal didn't even notice). As to the substance, note the astonishing sexism: feminism is fine as long as it stays "nurturing and embracing"; men don't find that threatening. With "feminists" like this dork, who needs male chauvinist pigs? > http://tinyurl.com/4xscos
