While I thank Anartaxius for his creative submission, I think he has the 
Blinding Light Church of the Presumptuous Assumption (a product of that holy 
alliance known as the Firesign Theater) with another congregation of somewhat 
lesser worth and notoriety. Also, although Xeno means well, the honorary title 
of Pastor ("He who leadeth the sheep to the fleecing") is neither to be 
confused with the lesser title of Pester ("He who merely annoyeth the sheep by 
poking them") or even Fester ("He who poketh the sheep so often that their 
wounds become infected and smelly"). Here is an example of the latter:

As for that other Hume-boy he's talking about, how can you trust anyone who 
spells words like 'vigor' and 'color' as 'vigour' and 'colour'? He's obviously 
some kinda furriner, probably from Scorpionland, and thus possibly evil. Even 
though evil doesn't exist.   

   

   From: "anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 4:22 AMSubject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Could it 
be...Satan?
   
    jr_esq, Barry's job is not 'pastor', it's more like 'pester'. It is a 
highly dignified profession, the exact opposite of what a 'pastor' does 
(enlightenment, in other words, is a great undoing, undoing what pastors try to 
do). Barry writes quickly, but sometimes he makes minor spelling errors, due to 
haste, hence he meant to say 'Pester Barry of the Grinding Might Lurch of the 
Voluptuous Resumption (more details of the church can be found online at 
http://tinyurl.com/ygvf8zb as part of of the complete training required to 
become a true teacher of TM in all things. Of course Barry has eschewed this 
learning as he has moved on, leaving with the current crop of followers of M to 
carry on this tradition). 
Whether or not free will exists, it is not necessary to choose between good and 
evil because those concepts are simply in the imagination of human beings. In 
the world, there is only what happens, it is neither good nor bad. The mind 
maps such concepts like good and evil onto the world, but they are not real, 
but they may seem real to a mind that is unclear about the relationship of 
thought to what happens in the world.
Here is a great explanation of how that happens (David Hume 1689):

OF THE ORIGIN OF IDEAS.
11.Every one will readily allow, that there is a considerable difference 
between the perceptions of the mind, when a man feels the pain of excessive 
heat, or the pleasure of moderate warmth, and when he afterwards recalls to his 
memory this sensation, or anticipates it by his imagination. These faculties 
may mimic or copy the perceptions of the senses; but they never can entirely 
reach the force and vivacity of the original sentiment. The utmost we say of 
them, even when they operate with greatest vigour, is, that they represent 
their object in so lively a manner, that we could almost say we feel or see it: 
But, except the mind be disordered by disease or madness, they never can arrive 
at such a pitch of vivacity, as to render these perceptions altogether 
undistinguishable. All the colours of poetry, however splendid, can never paint 
natural objects in such a manner as to make the description be taken for a real 
landskip [landscape]. The most lively thought is still inferior to the dullest 
sensation.
We may observe a like distinction to run through all the other perceptions of 
the mind. A man in a fit of anger, is actuated in a very different manner from 
one who only thinks of that emotion. If you tell me, that any person is in 
love, I easily understand your meaning, and form a just conception of his 
situation; but never can mistake that conception for the real disorders and 
agitations of the passion. When we reflect on our past sentiments and 
affections, our thought is a faithful mirror, and copies its objects truly; but 
the colours which it employs are faint and dull, in comparison of those in 
which our original perceptions were clothed. It requires no nice discernment or 
metaphysical head to mark the distinction between them.
12.Here therefore we may divide all the perceptions of the mind into two 
classes or species, which are distinguished by their different degrees of force 
and vivacity. The less forcible and lively are commonly denominated Thoughts or 
Ideas. The other species want a name in our language, and in most others; I 
suppose, because it was not requisite for any, but philosophical purposes, to 
rank them under a general term or appellation. Let us, therefore, use a little 
freedom, and call them Impressions; employing that word in a sense somewhat 
different from the usual. By the term impression, then, I mean all our more 
lively perceptions, when we hear, or see, or feel, or love, or hate, or desire, 
or will. And impressions are distinguished from ideas, which are the less 
lively perceptions, of which we are conscious, when we reflect on any of those 
sensations or movements above mentioned.
13.Nothing, at first view, may seem more unbounded than the thought of man, 
which not only escapes all human power and authority, but is not even 
restrained within the limits of nature and reality. To form monsters, and join 
incongruous shapes and appearances, costs the imagination no more trouble than 
to conceive the most natural and familiar objects. And while the body is 
confined to one planet, along which it creeps with pain and difficulty; the 
thought can in an instant transport us into the most distant regions of the 
universe; or even beyond the universe, into the unbounded chaos, where nature 
is supposed to lie in total confusion. What never was seen, or heard of, may 
yet be conceived; nor is any thing beyond the power of thought, except what 
implies an absolute contradiction.
But though our thought seems to possess this unbounded liberty, we shall find, 
upon a nearer examination, that it is really confined within very narrow 
limits, and that all this creative power of the mind amounts to no more than 
the faculty of compounding, transposing, augmenting, or diminishing the 
materials afforded us by the senses and experience. When we think of a golden 
mountain, we only join two consistent ideas, gold, and mountain, with which we 
were formerly acquainted. A virtuous horse we can conceive; because, from our 
own feeling, we can conceive virtue; and this we may unite to the figure and 
shape of a horse, which is an animal familiar to us. In short, all the 
materials of thinking are derived either from our outward or inward sentiment: 
the mixture and composition of these belongs alone to the mind and will. Or, to 
express myself in philosophical language, all our ideas or more feeble 
perceptions are copies of our impressions or more lively ones.
14.To prove this, the two following arguments will, I hope, be sufficient. 
First, when we analyze our thoughts or ideas, however compounded or sublime, we 
always find that they resolve themselves into such simple ideas as were copied 
from a precedent feeling or sentiment. Even those ideas, which, at first view, 
seem the most wide of this origin, are found, upon a nearer scrutiny, to be 
derived from it. The idea of God, as meaning an infinitely intelligent, wise, 
and good Being, arises from reflecting on the operations of our own mind, and 
augmenting, without limit, those qualities of goodness and wisdom. We may 
prosecute this enquiry to what length we please; where we shall always find, 
that every idea which we examine is copied from a similar impression. Those who 
would assert that this position is not universally true nor without exception, 
have only one, and that an easy method of refuting it; by producing that idea, 
which, in their opinion, is not derived from this source. It will then be 
incumbent on us, if we would maintain our doctrine, to produce the impression, 
or lively perception, which corresponds to it.
15.Secondly. If it happen, from a defect of the organ, that a man is not 
susceptible of any species of sensation, we always find that he is as little 
susceptible of the correspondent ideas. A blind man can form no notion of 
colours; a deaf man of sounds. Restore either of them that sense in which he is 
deficient; by opening this new inlet for his sensations, you also open an inlet 
for the ideas; and he finds no difficulty in conceiving these objects. The case 
is the same, if the object, proper for exciting any sensation, has never been 
applied to the organ. A Laplander or Negro has no notion of the relish of wine. 
And though there are few or no instances of a like deficiency in the mind, 
where a person has never felt or is wholly incapable of a sentiment or passion 
that belongs to his species; yet we find the same observation to take place in 
a less degree. A man of mild manners can form no idea of inveterate revenge or 
cruelty; nor can a selfish heart easily conceive the heights of friendship and 
generosity. It is readily allowed, that other beings may possess many senses of 
which we can have no conception; because the ideas of them have never been 
introduced to us in the only manner by which an idea can have access to the 
mind, to wit, by the actual feeling and sensation.
16.There is, however, one contradictory phenomenon, which may prove that it is 
not absolutely impossible for ideas to arise, independent of their 
correspondent impressions. I believe it will readily be allowed, that the 
several distinct ideas of colour, which enter by the eye, or those of sound, 
which are conveyed by the ear, are really different from each other; though, at 
the same time, resembling. Now if this be true of different colours, it must be 
no less so of the different shades of the same colour; and each shade produces 
a distinct idea, independent of the rest. For if this should be denied, it is 
possible, by the continual gradation of shades, to run a colour insensibly into 
what is most remote from it; and if you will not allow any of the means to be 
different, you cannot, without absurdity, deny the extremes to be the same. 
Suppose, therefore, a person to have enjoyed his sight for thirty years, and to 
have become perfectly acquainted with colours of all kinds except one 
particular shade of blue, for instance, which it never has been his fortune to 
meet with. Let all the different shades of that colour, except that single one, 
be placed before him, descending gradually from the deepest to the lightest; it 
is plain that he will perceive a blank, where that shade is wanting, and will 
be sensible that there is a greater distance in that place between the 
contiguous colours than in any other. Now I ask, whether it be possible for 
him, from his own imagination, to supply this deficiency, and raise up to 
himself the idea of that particular shade, though it had never been conveyed to 
him by his senses? I believe there are few but will be of opinion that he can: 
and this may serve as a proof that the simple ideas are not always, in every 
instance, derived from the correspondent impressions; though this instance is 
so singular, that it is scarcely worth our observing, and does not merit that 
for it alone we should alter our general maxim.
17.Here, therefore, is a proposition, which not only seems, in itself, simple 
and intelligible; but, if a proper use were made of it, might render every 
dispute equally intelligible, and banish all that jargon, which has so long 
taken possession of metaphysical reasonings, and drawn disgrace upon them. All 
ideas, especially abstract ones, are naturally faint and obscure: the mind has 
but a slender hold of them: they are apt to be confounded with other resembling 
ideas; and when we have often employed any term, though without a distinct 
meaning, we are apt to imagine it has a determinate idea annexed to it. On the 
contrary, all impressions, that is, all sensations, either outward or inward, 
are strong and vivid: the limits between them are more exactly determined: nor 
is it easy to fall into any error or mistake with regard to them. When we 
entertain, therefore, any suspicion that a philosophical term is employed 
without any meaning or idea (as is but too frequent), we need but enquire, from 
what impression is that supposed idea derived? And if it be impossible to 
assign any, this will serve to confirm our suspicion. By bringing ideas into so 
clear a light we may reasonably hope to remove all dispute, which may arise, 
concerning their nature and reality.  



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :

Pastor Barry,
Do you believe that human beings have a free will to choose between good and 
evil?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote :

Here's my theory about Satan, Old Nick, Lucifer, Beelzebub, Mephistopheles, or 
whatever you choose to call Him/It. Be warned.  :-)

Basically, as I see it, no such entity as Satan exists, just as no such entity 
as God exists. Satan is just something that believers in God thought up to 
cover their own philosophical short-sightedness. 

See, once these believers had invented a God who creates everything and runs 
everything according to His cosmic plan, they suddenly realized that they'd 
boxed themselves in and created a kind of nightmare for themselves. If, as they 
had already taught all their believer-followers, God runs *everything*, then 
*He* is the one responsible for child cancer, busloads of the faithful going 
over a cliff while on pilgrimage, floods, earthquakes and plagues that kill 
millions of innocent people, and well...just evil in general. If you actually 
believe that God *controls* all of these things, or worse *plans* all of this, 
then you pretty much have to admit that He's a psychotic thug. 

So to *avoid* having to admit that they had invented PsychoThug God, believers 
came up with the Other Guy -- Satan -- someone they could blame for all of the 
shitty things they don't want to attribute to God. 

This is the kind of convoluted logic people get into once they try to invent a 
God and claim that He controls everything. Someone points out that you just 
stated that God controls what you consider evil just as much as He controls 
what you consider good, and your philosophy is fucked. So you invent a new 
imaginary character and "amend" your philosophy so it reads, "OK, God controls 
everything...uh...*except* for that stuff we don't like...Satan controls that."

Now you know. 

[ The preceding sermon was brought to you by Pastor Barry of the Blinding Light 
Church of the Presumptuous Assumption ]

:-)




   #yiv3882698130 -- #yiv3882698130ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-mkp #yiv3882698130hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-mkp #yiv3882698130ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-mkp .yiv3882698130ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-mkp .yiv3882698130ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-mkp .yiv3882698130ad a 
{color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-sponsor #yiv3882698130ygrp-lc #yiv3882698130hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-sponsor #yiv3882698130ygrp-lc .yiv3882698130ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3882698130
 #yiv3882698130activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130activity span 
.yiv3882698130underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3882698130 
.yiv3882698130attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv3882698130 .yiv3882698130attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 .yiv3882698130attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3882698130 .yiv3882698130attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv3882698130 .yiv3882698130attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv3882698130 .yiv3882698130bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv3882698130 
.yiv3882698130bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 dd.yiv3882698130last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3882698130 dd.yiv3882698130last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv3882698130 
dd.yiv3882698130last p span.yiv3882698130yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv3882698130 div.yiv3882698130attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 div.yiv3882698130attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv3882698130 div.yiv3882698130file-title a, #yiv3882698130 
div.yiv3882698130file-title a:active, #yiv3882698130 
div.yiv3882698130file-title a:hover, #yiv3882698130 div.yiv3882698130file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 div.yiv3882698130photo-title a, 
#yiv3882698130 div.yiv3882698130photo-title a:active, #yiv3882698130 
div.yiv3882698130photo-title a:hover, #yiv3882698130 
div.yiv3882698130photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 
div#yiv3882698130ygrp-mlmsg #yiv3882698130ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv3882698130yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv3882698130 
.yiv3882698130green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv3882698130 .yiv3882698130MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv3882698130 o {font-size:0;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130photos div div {border:1px solid 
#666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130photos div label 
{color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv3882698130
  #yiv3882698130reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv3882698130 .yiv3882698130replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv3882698130 input, #yiv3882698130 textarea 
{font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv3882698130 code {font:115% 
monospace;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-mlmsg * 
{line-height:1.22em;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-mlmsg #yiv3882698130logo 
{padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-msg p a 
{font-family:Verdana;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-msg 
p#yiv3882698130attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-reco #yiv3882698130reco-head 
{color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-reco 
{margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3882698130ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-sponsor #yiv3882698130ov li 
{font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-sponsor #yiv3882698130ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 
8px;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-text 
{font-family:Georgia;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 
0;}#yiv3882698130 #yiv3882698130ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv3882698130 
#yiv3882698130ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none 
!important;}#yiv3882698130 

  

Reply via email to