"Lost Beauty of Disharmony"
http://neosurrealismart.com/modern-art-prints/?artworks/lost-beauty-of-disharmony.html&fullsize

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Maybe: My buttons are being  pushed.
> 
> Maybe: I am angry at an opinion being expressed that I don't agree with.
> 
> Maybe: I resent anyone attacking the TMO.
> 
> But also,
> 
> Maybe: Barry has developed a blind spot that prevents him from seeing
> the rut he has fallen into.
> 
> Naturally, I think it is the latter Maybe.  But I hold out the
> possibility that it may be the former.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Here's what seems odd to me. Six weeks ago Tart posted a nice piece
> > about why after all this time we are still discussing these issues.
> > The gist was that it was to revisit the foundations on which we built
> > our adult lives, and to see which of the pillars were solid, and which
> > were shaky. And as I recall you were about the first to respond with
> an
> > enthusiastic affirmation of this process. So, has the process been
> > completed and now you determine that "the work has been done", and
> > henceforth any such efforts constitute a waste of time? Really.
> >
> > You continue to rail against the shallowness of this site, and yet you
> > are the number one contributor in terms of words written. How do you
> > square that? And what about basic courtesy or tolerance of other
> > people's opinions? Is it your objective to poison the site with plain
> > old meanness? When you first came on board, you offered what I guess
> > was a Buddhist perspective. That is long gone. And what is left is
> > just unabridged cynicism, and a lack of tolerance. But maybe
> everything
> > seems just hunky dory to you.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You are bored with being you. Everyone can understand that.
> > >
> > > And everyone can as easily understand that, as
> > > usual, when someone says something you don't like,
> > > you drop into "attack mode." :-)
> > >
> > > I repeat my contention. No one on planet Earth
> > > gives a shit whether what Maharishi said and did
> > > was "in accord with the laws of nature" or not,
> > > or whether he was enlightened or not, except for
> > > people trying to justify their years (and tens of
> > > thousands of dollars) of investment in him. T'would
> > > seem you're one of those people, so to you debating
> > > the subject endlessly is not boring. To me, it is.
> > >
> > > > Whether you are bored is not relevant to any conversation
> > > > between any two people on this forum. Your presence here
> > > > is just a way to insert your comments without cause.
> > >
> > > Absolutely. And?
> > >
> > > Oh. I forgot. You don't like people being able to
> > > make comments you don't agree with. :-)
> > >
> > > > Go back to the nothingness of you and enjoy it ... just as
> > > > we enjoy your absence and your consequent irrelevance.
> > >
> > > We? Is that a vajra in your pocket, or are you
> > > glad to see me? :-)
> > >
> > > > With all due respect.
> > >
> > > Uh-huh. :-)
> > >
> > > I generally ignore anything you say, Empt. Might
> > > I suggest you just do the same with what I say?
> > > As much as you don't like the fact, I have the
> > > right to say anything I want. Here, or elsewhere.
> > >
> > > > *****************************************
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > With all due respect, you're back to one of the
> > > > > BORING arguments on FFL.
> > > > >
> > > > > Who, after all, really cares, except for a few
> > > > > people still trying to justify their investment
> > > > > of time, money, and belief for all those years?
> > > > > Maharishi's dead, and it looks as if his movement
> > > > > will be as well in a few years, maybe sooner. No
> > > > > one else on the planet gives a shit.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to