On Oct 14, 2007, at 4:04 AM, cardemaister wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the Maniprabha's comment on this sutra:
These siddhis [that is] the Vividness of the subtle senses and
the
like in the case of one
devoted to samadhi, (the fruit of
On Oct 14, 2007, at 6:54 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:41 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:37 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Unfortunately cultivation of siddhis, esp, via samyama is the
opposite of that, according to the Shankaracharya tradition and
numerous others.
But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Unfortunately cultivation of siddhis, esp, via samyama is the
opposite of that,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Unfortunately
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samyama in the yoga sutra refers to a particular practice: dharana,
dhyana and samadhi.
That term of and by itself does not specify what object that samyama
is being performed
on.
Well, here's Vyaasa's comment on
Vaj writes snipped;
Actually the way it's taught by lineal Patanjali masters is that
siddhis are not to be cultivated via samyama but instead are
spontaneous side-effects of samadhi. Swami Brahmananda Saraswati
emphasized this as well.
TomT:
As I have stated previously The sutras are not a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the Maniprabha's comment on this sutra:
These siddhis [that is] the Vividness of the subtle senses and
the
like in the case of one
devoted to samadhi, (the fruit of which is final bliss), are
obstacles, [that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
I like the Maniprabha's comment on this sutra:
These siddhis [that is] the Vividness of the subtle senses
and
the
like in the case of one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:41 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:37 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Don't do this, be careful about this, watch how
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:41 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:37 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Don't do this, be careful about this, watch how
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the Maniprabha's comment on this sutra:
Gosh, I wonder why?
These siddhis [that is] the Vividness of the subtle senses
and the like in the case of one devoted to samadhi, (the fruit
of which is final bliss), are
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:05 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the Maniprabha's comment on this sutra:
Gosh, I wonder why?
These siddhis [that is] the Vividness of the subtle senses
and the like in the case of one devoted to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:05 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
I like the Maniprabha's comment on this sutra:
Gosh, I wonder why?
These siddhis [that is] the
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:48 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:05 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
I like the Maniprabha's comment on this sutra:
Gosh, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:48 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:05 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
On Oct 13, 2007, at 2:57 PM, BillyG. wrote:
It's actually what my teachers from this tradition have taught me
and
of course it has a textually and lineal basis as well.
I may or may not be of some help here, but, perhaps the warning is
there to remind one that the siddhis should only be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 2:57 PM, BillyG. wrote:
It's actually what my teachers from this tradition have taught
me
and
of course it has a textually and lineal basis as well.
I may or may not be of some help here,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:48 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 1:05 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:37 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Don't do this, be careful about this, watch how this and that goes,
warning against this...Absent common sense, why be so concerned
about this practice and that? Such thinking reeks of dogma to me.
LOL, no it's not dogma Jim, it's the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:37 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Don't do this, be careful about this, watch how this and that
goes,
warning against this...Absent common sense, why be so concerned
about this practice and that? Such
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:41 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:37 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Don't do this, be careful about this, watch how this and that
goes,
warning against this...Absent common sense, why be so
25 matches
Mail list logo
