--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" wrote:
> a position that is fraught with
> > addictive pain.
> >
> Hi Rory, so are you using the expression "addictive pain" because we
> find it easier to rec
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --Right, but Byron Katie is a Neo-Advaitin, and if we go too far into
> that realm, there's no karma, no people, no suffering (in fact,
> nothing!).
Has that been your experience with her Inquiry? It certainl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes!
Do you have to tread? Can you walk, saunter, run, skip or hop?
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a position that is fraught with
> addictive pain.
>
Hi Rory, so are you using the expression "addictive pain" because we
find it easier to recycle the pain habitually (from a separated ego
standpoint), vs. face Realit
--Right, but Byron Katie is a Neo-Advaitin, and if we go too far into
that realm, there's no karma, no people, no suffering (in fact,
nothing!). Nope - Buddhism as a whole has more compassion.
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@ya
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes!
>
Ananda Ma (I think this is the one in CA) yes
Maharishi G- yes
BillyG- Yes
Swami G- I don't know
Ronmay, TanmayG- I thought it over- Kundalini is transcient, when all is gone,
what
remains is Being- I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This post is precious.
>
> One TM brainwashed cult fanatic -- nablusoss1008 -- insults a former TM
> brainwashed cult fanatic -- Ron -- who is currently the brainwashed
> cult fanatic of another guru because he no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now let me get this straight. This sobering up
> and seeing things otherwise, that's something
> that we "should" be doing?
*lol* Do what you want, of course -- I don't expect you to do
otherwise! What you choose to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > I think that this is the most accurate and telling
> > statement in your post, Ron, and the one that is
> > most relevant to Fairfield Life and the majo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that this is the most accurate and telling
> statement in your post, Ron, and the one that is
> most relevant to Fairfield Life and the majority
> of posts here about spiritual "progress." It's
> about *persona
Yes!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> This post is precious.
>
> One TM brainwashed cult fanatic -- nablusoss1008 -- insults a former
TM
> brainwashed cult fanatic -- Ron -- who is currently the brainwashed
> cult fanatic of another guru because he
This post is precious.
One TM brainwashed cult fanatic -- nablusoss1008 -- insults a former TM
brainwashed cult fanatic -- Ron -- who is currently the brainwashed
cult fanatic of another guru because he no longer follows the dictums
of the TM cult.
Please. More of such posts. I can't get eno
"Such a guru my be a Sadguru for
one person and not a Sadguru for another."
Cheer up little Sad Guru. Things aren't so bad. Get outside, throw a
frisbee, get a girlfriend, share some ice cream. Where's that smile
little Sad Guru...there it is! Whose being a silly little Sad Guru
now? If you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
YOU ARE A FOOL, fooling yourself has no great value.
Get a job.
On Jul 23, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:
For example, for the
last year and a half, I've often had the subtle energetic sensation
that the top of my head is not there and that there's a sort of
fountain shooting up and out of it.
Sounds very much like one the "counterpart sign" of e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > I think that this is the most accurate and telling
> > statement in your post, Ron, and the one that is
> > most relevant to Fairfield Life and the majority
If you spend time with a "guru" and you do not become
Realized, guess what? They're not your Sadguru. You
gain value from that association and perhaps in the
scheme of things you needed to spend some time
unstressing/purifying/completing-a-karmic-debt with
that particular guru. Such a guru my be a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The only thing I can think of at the moment, after reading your
> whole post, is that famous quote, if at first you dont succeed,
> try and try again.
In other words, just as I was saying at the beginning
of this exchang
Hello,
The only thing I can think of at the moment, after reading your whole post, is
that famous
quote, if at first you dont succeed, try and try again. Possibly rather than
lump the whole
Guru trip as something you have decided you were bored with, as none of them
did
anything for you, may
On Jul 23, 2007, at 6:56 AM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that this is the most accurate and telling
> statement in your post, Ron, and the one that is
> most relevant to Fairfield Life and the majority
> of posts here ab
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > My post is about a topic one level further up the
> > logic tree -- why do you assume that someone is a
> > "guru," and *when* you do, why do you assume that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that this is the most accurate and telling
> statement in your post, Ron, and the one that is
> most relevant to Fairfield Life and the majority
> of posts here about spiritual "progress." It's
> about *personal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No one has yet stated the obvious, and that is that it
> is not necessary to tread the path of "kundalini
> awakening" to become realized. Of course those on such
> a path will claim it is.
>
> Tanmay: Well peter, I am usin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" wrote:
> >
> > > No one has yet stated the obvious, and that is that it
> > > is not necessary to tread the path of "kundalini
> > > awakening" to become realized. Of course
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No one has yet stated the obvious, and that is that it
> > is not necessary to tread the path of "kundalini
> > awakening" to become realized. Of course those on such
> > a path will claim it is.
>
> Tanmay: Well peter, I
26 matches
Mail list logo
