TurquoiseB:
> I was the first person to post this "hit piece"
> about Judith Bourque. I did so *proactively*,
> knowing that cultist sleazebags on this forum...
>
So, you're the cultist sleezebag that trotted out
this "hit piece" about Judith Bourque, so you could
*proactively* shoot the TMers
Even if you are partly correct, how annoying to put Amy Whine house as a
rebuttle. Geez.
From: nablusoss1008
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 15 July, 2010 11:15:04 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judith Bourque expose
--- In FairfieldLife
The spirituals "Jerry Springer" show! lol. : )
From: nablusoss1008
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 15 July, 2010 8:32:14 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judith Bourque expose
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill
On Jul 15, 2010, at 9:35 PM, emptybill wrote:
This is a quite humorous and emotional reply on your part. You must
find it quite threatening to consider anything outside of your own
viewpoint. Sorry that your mind is so disturbed and your emotions
so agitated. Ain't sansara a bitch?
No,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "It's just a ride"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, emptybill wrote:
> >
> > I case you haven't seen this yet, here is some info that may
> > give you pause ... at least to bracket what you have heard
> > or read:
> >
> > http://conny-larsson-e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
>
> I case you haven't seen this yet, here is some info that may give you
> pause ... at least to bracket what you have heard or read:
>
> http://conny-larsson-exposed.blogspot.com/2009/03/filmmaker-judith-bourq\
> ue.html
I did read all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> Oops! Hit a nerve? Vaj sees nothing wrong with lying or promoting lies about
> Maharishi, but when someone like emptybill, who has no dog in the fight,
> presents information that questions Judith's motivation and truthfulness,
> r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 8:16 PM, raunchydog wrote:
>
> > Yep, consider the source. Thanks, emptybill, for digging beneath the
> > surface of all the hoopla of the past few days surrounding Judith's claims
> > of sexcapades with Maharishi. Ev
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> >
> > I case you haven't seen this yet, here is some info that may give you
> > pause ... at least to bracket what you have heard or read:
> >
> >
http://conny-larsson-exposed.blogspot.com/
A sad story indeed, Conny Larson caught in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> Yep, consider the source. Thanks, emptybill, for digging beneath the surface
> of all the hoopla of the past few days surrounding Judith's claims of
> sexcapades with Maharishi. Even if she is telling the truth, (which I now
> doub
This is a quite humorous and emotional reply on your part. You must find
it quite threatening to consider anything outside of your own viewpoint.
Sorry that your mind is so disturbed and your emotions so agitated.
Ain't sansara a bitch?
I don't have a dog in this fight any more than in the sw
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
>
> I case you haven't seen this yet, here is some info that may give you
> pause ... at least to bracket what you have heard or read:
>
>
http://conny-larsson-exposed.blogspot.com/2009/03/filmmaker-judith-bourq\
\
> ue.html
>
>
> Introduc
On Jul 15, 2010, at 8:16 PM, raunchydog wrote:
> Yep, consider the source. Thanks, emptybill, for digging beneath the surface
> of all the hoopla of the past few days surrounding Judith's claims of
> sexcapades with Maharishi. Even if she is telling the truth, (which I now
> doubt) I think it'
Yep, consider the source. Thanks, emptybill, for digging beneath the surface of
all the hoopla of the past few days surrounding Judith's claims of sexcapades
with Maharishi. Even if she is telling the truth, (which I now doubt) I think
it's in poor taste to write about the intimate details of an
14 matches
Mail list logo
