X,
Lots of agreement with ya, and ya instructed me on a couple of nuances of word
usage too, so thanks for that.
I'll comment, but also I'll be snipping the stuff for which I have no immediate
response.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
You:
Duveyoung, I find this rather an intriguing response.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
X,
Not so sure I can defend the equation. If Curtis pipes in, I'm doomed, but,
but, but . . . let's see what I come up with.
To me, radiation-less space has the
X,
Not so sure I can defend the equation. If Curtis pipes in, I'm doomed, but,
but, but . . . let's see what I come up with.
To me, radiation-less space has the quality of being almost not there -- and
it would be tough to say more, but consider how everyone feels they have a
significant
The problem most folks have with relativity is that they don't grok space
nearly as much as they do time.
Same deal with them when it comes to seeing the importance of Self when
everyone goes around strutting as an expert on thoughts.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
The problem most folks have with relativity is that they don't grok space
nearly as much as they do time.
Same deal with them when it comes to seeing the importance of Self when
everyone goes around strutting as an
The faster than light finding by scientist at CERN could be due to a lensing
effect of the soil and rock that the particle had to traverse from CERN to the
lab in Italy. IOW, relative to particle's clock time, the particle is moving
at the speed of light. But relative to the lab clock, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@... wrote:
Do you believe ONA is real?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPERA_neutrino_anomaly
http://dvice.com/archives/2011/10/speedy-neutrino.php
Those weird faster-than-light neutrinos that CERN thought they saw last month