--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
> starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
> incomes below say $15,000) would eliminate all the inefficiencies,
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
> > disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to have
> more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
> > starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
> > disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to
have
> more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 24, 2006, at 4:57 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>
> >> That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
> >> disincentive to accumula
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
> > disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to
have
> more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
> > disincentive to accumulating excessive wealth. It is better to
have
> more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Its a matter of social and collective values. I dream of a day when
> kids grow up wanting to make billions so they can make a transform
> world health, nutrition, shelter, education, spirituality,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That's why a progressiv
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work this
> way: once you had an estate valued at 12 million the progressive tax
> would kick in.
At what rate(s)? At the current 35-60% (aproximate numbers)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> >
> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>A flat tax (some say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> >>> wrot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work
this
> > way: once you had an estate valued at 12 million the progressive
tax
> > woul
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> In 2006, the estate tax exemption is $2,000,000 per person
> ($4,000,000 for a married couple) and that's going up to $3,500,000
> per person in a few years.
ok. thanks It was 1 or 1.1 mil in 2004 (for single). I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> shempmcgurk wrote:
> >Concentrated wealth in the hands of those responsible for creating
> >it is a GREAT thing and should be encourated.
> >
> > Bhairitu, if you tax it, it goes to government which will NOT use
> > it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > >Concentrated wealth in the hands of those responsible for
creating
> > >it is a GREAT thing and should be encourated.
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > > shempmcgurk wrote:
> >
> > > >Concentrated wealth in the hands of those respo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
> who care little about their fellow humanity. People like Bill Gates
are
> a rare exception
Well 280 billion annually in american philanthropy s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
> who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
> of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
> package.
>
> At some point in the accumulation o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
> > who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
> > of contortions to obt
Original posts
> I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
> who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
> of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
> package.
>
> At some point in the accumulation of wealth, money
> ceases to be a medium of exchange and becomes s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > > When rich people talk about money, they're talking
> > > about something entirely different from what poor and
> > > middle-class people m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> > > > When rich people talk about money, they're talking
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
>
Judy,
Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
-- that you maybe confusing correleation with causation with regards
to "being rich" and "empathy towards the 'non-rich'" -- is a minor and
not substantive one, and focuses on my poor traits -- not a critique
of the thesis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Judy,
>
> Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
> -- that you maybe confusing correleation with causation with regards
> to "being rich" and "empathy towards the 'non-rich'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new.morning wrote:
>
>>> BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
> >
> >I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and adopt
> >it. I think through each issue and decide on the merit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
> >>
> >>
> >bastards
> >
> >
> >>who care l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>History shows that not to be true at all.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy,
> >
> > Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
> > -- that you maybe confusing correleation with c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy,
> >
> > Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
> > -- that you maybe confusing correleation with c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy,
> >
> > Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
> > -- that you maybe confusing correleation with c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>new.morning wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy,
> > >
> > > Again, I am heartedned that you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Judy,
> > >
> > > Again, I am heartedned that you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
> >>
> >>
> >bastards
> >
> >
> >>who care l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > > new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> > >
> > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
[...]
> >>If anything they need a serious course in meditation as they are too
> >>attached to their wealth.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >A point t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > Interesting thing to say about Gates. His stated goal in life
> > > for several decades wa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > > > Interesting thi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>new.morning wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>History shows that not to be true at all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > > new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> > >
> > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > new_morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >[...]
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >>sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> If anything they need a serious cour
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >[...]
> >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
TurquoiseB wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
>>starting at incomes over $30-50,000, (even a negative income taxfor
>>incomes below say $15,000) would eliminate a
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>
>>
>>>That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
>>>disincentive to accumulating exces
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
>>>starting at incomes over $30-
shempmcgurk wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu w
new.morning wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work this
>>way: once you had an estate valued at 12 million the progressive tax
>>would kick in.
>>
>>
>
>At what rate(s)? At th
new.morning wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
>>>
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
>>
>>
>bastards
>
>
>>who care little about their fellow humanity. People like Bill Gates
>>
>>
>are
>
>
shempmcgurk wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>
>>
>>>And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work
>>>
>>>
>this
>
>
>>>way: once you had an estate
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>new.morning wrote:
>>
>>
>>
BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
>>>I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and ado
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
new.morning wrote:
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
shempmcgurk wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
new.morning wrote:
>>BTW, d
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>sparaig wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>[...]
>
>
If anything they need a serious course in meditation as they are too
attached
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>>
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" w
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>>
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
authfriend wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>sparaig wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Few people are aware that any suggestion for the elimination of the
> estate tax comes with the elimination of the stepped-up basis for
> capital gains. Currently, all capital gains get "stepped-up" of
> their co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > Few people are aware that any suggestion for the elimination of
the
> > estate tax comes with the elimination of the stepped-up basis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Few people are aware that any suggestion for the eliminat
78 matches
Mail list logo
