ph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 10:28 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Proposition: Awareness Exists (was Buddhist Logic)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Suppose, in relation to 'consciousness',
OMG! God is real! That, seerdope, read in the stillness of the late morning,
is a wondrous and beautiful piece.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Thanks Curtis and to all for your responses to these questions.
Curtis: "Great thought exercise, how would you answer them
Thanks Curtis and to all for your responses to these questions.
Curtis: "Great thought exercise, how would you answer them?"
Asking the questions (off the top of my head rapid fire) was a useful exercise
-- perhaps as much or more so than trying to answer them. Answers may vary
from m
Thanks Curtis and all for your responses top these questions.
Curtis: "Great thought exercise, how would you answer them?"
Probably along the lines you did. However, for me, asking the questions (of
the top of my head rapid fire) was a useful exercise -- perhaps as much or more
t
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Suppose, in relation to 'consciousness', even with enlightenment, this matter
could never satisfactorily be resolved? Suppose you could experience the truth,
if such be possible, but it could never be understood by the intellect and
ultimately
Suppose, in relation to 'consciousness', even with enlightenment, this matter
could never satisfactorily be resolved? Suppose you could experience the truth,
if such be possible, but it could never be understood by the intellect and
ultimately never be reconciled logically?
---In Fairfiel
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I'm working two contradictory theses here!
1) idealism: only mind exists.
2) panpsychism: all matter *has* awareness.
They can be reconciled but it's too much like hard work to do so on a FFL
post. I answer your queries below . . .
Re
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Gunna answer these to see if I'm "Advaita sharp" today.
Is awareness dependent upon a (human or otherwise) nervous system?
No. Awareness is the "water cannot wet it" thingy that isn't a thingy. The
qualities of a nervous system that are gro
I'm working two contradictory theses here!
1) idealism: only mind exists.
2) panpsychism: all matter *has* awareness.
They can be reconciled but it's too much like hard work to do so on a FFL
post. I answer your queries below . . .
Re "What other paradigm other than your own experience
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Is awareness dependent upon a (human or otherwise) nervous system?
C: I don't see any counterexamples for this but it might be unknowable.
S: Because you take your own human awareness as the paradigm case and look for
similar instances.
C: I
Is awareness dependent upon a (human or otherwise) nervous system?
C: I don't see any counterexamples for this but it might be unknowable.
S: Because you take your own human awareness as the paradigm case and look for
similar instances. Cats and dogs seem to have similarities in their behav
I'll pick a few to mumble about.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Is awareness dependent upon a (human or otherwise) nervous system?
C: I don't see any counterexamples for this but it might be unknowable.
Is awareness the same for all who possess awareness?
C: You might
12 matches
Mail list logo
