--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Turq and other guru enthusiasts...
Bronte and other idiots, take a look at yourselves.
You're PROJECTING your own shit, babe. As almost
anyone here could tell you, I am no "guru enthusiast."
Get your own act togeth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bronte, you are certainly not an idiot, and Turq's calling
> you one only reveals that his emotions trumped his intellect
> in this case, causing him to violate our agreement not to
> resort to personal insults.
Similar thoughts occur to me on this Judy. I have had some nice go
arounds with Jim, Rory and others on this. (And I am using your post
as a springboard for some thoughts that have occurred to me, and I am
not directly addressing each of your points.)
If I have understood his position, Jim, rathe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If I have understood his position, Jim, rather emphatically as I
> recall, stated that, paraphrasing, he did not want to help the
> suffering in Iraq, even thought he says he has the ability to
> quickly fulfill all
Thank you for the quote.
First, let me preface this by saying that I acknowledge that what I
inferred Jim was saying may not be what he intended. From the larger
context of his posts on this topic, beyond the quote, and even from
the quote itself, I am not yet sure that what I inferred was off
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Restatement of Focus: There appears to be a view subscribed to by
> some, that might be summarized as "Everything is Perfect as it is".
> While there are many different implications and possible subview
> following form
---
The neutered people are the Neo-Advaitins, who are trapped in a form
of delusion (even if Enlightened); delusions are possible on many
levels; chief among them is the notion that there's no
individual "there". There IS, but simply lacking in
misidentification of the "I". What remains is t
Just a note on the assertion that "everything is
perfect just as it is," which seems to engender
some misunderstanding (including in the interview
with Ramesh Balsekar that qntmpkt posted):
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the conditions o
jstein wrote:
> Virtually every teaching I've ever encountered about
> enlightenment has said the same thing (usually at
> much greater length): experiencing (not just believing)
> that everything is perfect just as it is does *not*
> mean not wanting to change anything.
>
Don't know exactly where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point is, that if everything is perfect, just as it
> is, then there would be no need for yoga, the goal of
> which is perfection.
Yeah, the above is exactly the misunderstanding
I was attempting to po
Most "Neo-Advaitins" are so full of mood making shit
it ain't funny. They take a description of the
experiential reality of Realization and then use it as
a waking state concept to "become" enlightened. What
idiots. Most don't meditate or do any sort of
practice, smoke dope and drink and then try t
11 matches
Mail list logo
