--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> Vaj would call MMY a liar no matter *what* ashrama
> > he'd said he was in, of course. MMY's damned if he
> > does, damned if he doesn't.
> >
>
> Ther
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vaj would call MMY a liar no matter *what* ashrama
> he'd said he was in, of course. MMY's damned if he
> does, damned if he doesn't.
>
There is a delicious irony here; that Vaj, on the one hand, implied in
a post rec
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:37 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:26 AM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> >>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:37 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:26 AM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> >>>
--- (TM - are you missing something.) Yes, try chanting one round of
the Gayatri mantra per day. Do this for 30 days and report back on
the results. Nothing ventured, nothing gained!.
>
> I have always heard that TM is for householders, in the sense that
> it's easy for almost everybody to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:37 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:26 AM, sparaig wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> >>>
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:37 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:26 AM, sparaig wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote: You seem to be approaching a spiritual practice from a very materialistic perspect
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "gigarm2003" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have always heard that TM is for householders, in the sense that
> it's easy for almost everybody to find 15-20 minutes twice a day to
> practice a simple technique.
> It's different for Purushas and Divine Mother
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Re: Thinking from Transcendence
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > TM ... mak[es] your desires more life/evolution-supporting.
>
> What if ones ontology or religious beliefs do not ho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:26 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> You seem to be approaching a spiritual practice from a
> >> very materialistic perspective. If you beli
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "gigarm2003" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have always heard that TM is for householders, in the sense that
> it's easy for almost everybody to find 15-20 minutes twice a day to
> practice a simple technique.
> It's different for Purushas and Divine Mother
I have always heard that TM is for householders, in the sense that
it's easy for almost everybody to find 15-20 minutes twice a day to
practice a simple technique.
It's different for Purushas and Divine Mother whose programs take
more time.
What is not easy to understand for me is how a desire
Re: Thinking from Transcendence
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TM ... mak[es] your desires more life/evolution-supporting.
What if ones ontology or religious beliefs do not hold that life
necessarily evolves to higher states -- per an implied grand
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TM ... mak[es] your desires more life/evolution-supporting.
What if ones ontology or relitions beliefs do not hold that life
necessarily evolves to higher states -- per an implied grand design?
--
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:26 AM, sparaig wrote:
> > TM is a technique for householders.
>
> So then Purusha and Mother Divine shouldn't be or wouldn't be
> practicing TM?
>
> Has something changed we hadn't heard of? The va
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:26 AM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You seem to be approaching a spiritual practice from a very materialistic perspective. If you believe a spiritual practice will fulfill your material desires of the mind, you are qu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You seem to be approaching a spiritual practice from a
> very materialistic perspective. If you believe a
> spiritual practice will fulfill your material desires
> of the mind, you are quite mistaken. Fulfillment does
> not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> You seem to be approaching a spiritual practice from a
> very materialistic perspective. If you believe a
> spiritual practice will fulfill your material desires
> of the mind, you are quite mistaken. Fulfillment does
> not
18 matches
Mail list logo
