On 12/6/2014 11:53 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
It was his idea, not mine. He is calling for silence and I am saying
start us off, lead by example.
>
I don't want anyone to be silent - this is a discussion group. Why are
you guys so concerned with what anyone posts to this group, anyway? You
It was his idea, not mine. He is calling for silence and I am saying start us
off, lead by example.
Linking this to tragic news events is seriously trollish and shitty Richard.
What is your deal?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 12/6/2014 10:15 AM, curtisdeltablues wrot
Richard, imo in a society filled with corrupt leaders, the term ex-con is
meaningless. Heck, a family member was in jail for writing bad checks! They
probably couldn't get a decent paying job and were starving to death!
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:47 PM, "'Richard J. Williams'
pundits..
On 09/03/2014 09:56 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Bhairitu, but evidently people can install filters to block out
whoever they want to ignore.
>
On 9/3/2014 12:46 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>
Only on email not the web site. Remembe
On 9/3/2014 12:06 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
When reading from the web you don't have to delete anything. I see
only the first two lines of all posts, if not wanting to read it I
simply scroll down.
>
Just keep it simple.
Apparently they want to make everything complicated: subscribing to a
On 9/3/2014 11:46 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
You're missing that people have to delete posts in the first place.
And what about those who want to read via the web? They CAN'T delete
the malcontent's posts.
You're way too passive.
>
Maybe you are posting mis
On 9/3/2014 11:20 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Ann, the difference is turq only told me to STFU. He's talking about
nuking Richard. IOW, using a violent image. For someone posting a
lot?! It seems wrong to me.
>
Yes, that is a problem, Share. Perhaps he posted in
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Share, how would you like it if you woke up one morning, went to the
domes and found that graffiti had been painted all over them. Guess
you would be alright with that?
>
On 9/3/2014 11:23 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>
I think he was when he wrote about nuking Richard.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 8:52 PM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife]" wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ann, I think verbal violence helps create an atmosphere in which physical
violence can occur
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ann, I think verbal violence helps create an atmosphere in which physical
violence can occur and then proliferate.
So are you saying bawee was being verbally violent or that you were when you
responded to him?
On Wednesday, September
ork, anyone responding to Richard directly goes into
my fluff folder. So I don't get to read Share's posts any more.
From: "TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 8:52 AM
Subj
Have you been hacking, Ann?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I don't know about that, I saw an aspect of her spicy enchilada today.
On 09/03/2014 09:13 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Well Bhairitu, one morning I woke up and so
like just skip over them?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You're missing that people have to delete posts in the first place. And what
about those who want to read via the web? They CAN'T delete the malcontent's
posts.
You're way too passive.
On 09/03/2014 09:13 AM, S
see dude, the domes are where you turn inward. what's on the outside doesn't
matter much. who cares how much graffiti there might be.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Share, how would you like it if you woke up one morning, went to the domes and
found that graffiti had been pai
From: "TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
From: "jedi_spock@... [FairfieldLife]"
To flood the forum like a huge dump tr
right, why not. prolly not gonna happen though.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 9/3/2014 8:48 AM, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
well, well, well,
hey, I'm fine with 200 post per month, Jedi.
Count me in.
Just
On 9/3/2014 11:00 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Share, how would you like it if you woke up one morning, went to the
domes and found that graffiti had been painted all over them. Guess
you would be alright with that?
>
What if Share woke up in the morning and rea
*I don't have a problem with most of what you say here given that
Richard is either out of control or is just pretending to be but to
describe a potential conversation with you at FFL to be potentially
"pleasant" is pretty hilarious from my point of view. If booting
Richard could guarantee
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
I call for '200 posts per month' limit. That should be easy
for any moderator to manage.
>
On 9/3/2014 10:58 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>
Nah, just boo
On 9/3/2014 10:56 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Impressive!!
not.
>
Jim , it is VERY impressive for a nerd to figure out how to make a
folder and a filter in Yahoo Mail. We get paid good money to teach
teachers how to do that in Microsoft Outlook, a professional
On 9/3/2014 10:53 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Nail on the head, Steve - Indeed, "the grooviest". Hilarious! Also the
clearest, most real post from Share, EVER. Thank you, both!
>
You guys have really made my day! Good work.
>
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
es into my fluff folder. So I
don't get to read Share's posts any more.
*From:* "TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 3, 2014 8:52 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Fai
On 9/3/2014 10:11 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
Please don't forget that the Turq who is now bringing up the issue of
posting limits, was consistently among the 3 top poster before limits
was enforced. The Turq doesn't like what Richard is posting.
Period. Particularily he hates being reminded con
> > He could have posted something interesting to read about -
> > a review of a crappy movie or a lonely cafe experience - instead
> > of wasting band-space and time obsessing about me.
> >
On 9/3/2014 10:07 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
The Turq's problem is that you, amongs very few posters, post
/This is funny - a guy that obviously doesn't even read my posts,
and has never, in over ten years had a discussion with me, thinks
I'm nuts for trying to start a discussion//on a discussion forum//./
>
>
On 9/3/2014 8:52 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>
I've
harelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
No, Michael, I don't think it's alright.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 2:08 PM, "Michael Jac
you never told Buck that - wonder why?
From: "Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
No, Mi
On 9/3/2014 8:40 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
*I don't have a problem with most of what you say here given that
Richard is either out of control or is just pretending to be but to
describe a potential conversation with you at FFL to be potentially
"pleasant" is pretty hi
neganaut" to be killed by drone strikes?
From: "Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
Ann,
e@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
Ann, the difference is turq only told me to STFU. He's talking about nuking
Richard. IOW, using a violent image. For someone posting a lot?! It seems wrong
to me.
On We
On 9/3/2014 2:58 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>
By the way, Vaj's email is also bouncing. Is he dead as well?
>
There is, so far, no evidence that Judy is dead, although I got no
response from her when I sent her a message recently using Yahoo Mail.
There are several reasons
On 09/03/2014 09:56 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Bhairitu, but evidently people can install filters to block out
whoever they want to ignore.
Only on email not the web site. Remember not everyone reads this place
via email. There are the lurkers who probably wa
When reading from the web you don't have to delete anything. I see only the
first two lines of all posts, if not wanting to read hate-posts from MJ I
simply scroll down.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You're missing that peo
When reading from the web you don't have to delete anything. I see only the
first two lines of all posts, if not wanting to read it I simply scroll down.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You're missing that people have to delet
Ann, I think verbal violence helps create an atmosphere in which physical
violence can occur and then proliferate.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 11:58 AM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife]" wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ann, the difference is turq
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You're missing that people have to delete posts in the first place. And what
about those who want to read via the web? They CAN'T delete the malcontent's
posts.
You're way too passive.
I don't know about that, I saw an aspect of her spi
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Ann, the difference is turq only told me to STFU. He's talking about nuking
Richard. IOW, using a violent image. For someone posting a lot?! It seems wrong
to me.
Hey, I like your spunk. Nothing wrong with righteous indignation.
On W
Bhairitu, but evidently people can install filters to block out whoever they
want to ignore. That seems more fair to me than booting someone who other
people might enjoy. What if we all got to boot one person from FFL? There'd
probably be no one left! IMO booting is not the answer unless someone
You're missing that people have to delete posts in the first place. And
what about those who want to read via the web? They CAN'T delete the
malcontent's posts.
You're way too passive.
On 09/03/2014 09:13 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Well Bhairitu, one morning
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Share, how would you like it if you woke up one morning, went to the domes and
found that graffiti had been painted all over them. Guess you would be alright
with that?
Relevant question.
On 09/03/2014 05:14 AM, Share Long sharelong60@..
Ann, the difference is turq only told me to STFU. He's talking about nuking
Richard. IOW, using a violent image. For someone posting a lot?! It seems wrong
to me.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 11:00 AM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife]" wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoog
Well Bhairitu, one morning I woke up and some anti TM malcontents had shot out
the windows of a bunch of cars on campus because the Iowa DOT decided to build
the bypass to the south of town rather than to the north. So I could probably
handle a little graffitti on the Dome.
OTOH, I don't unders
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 9/3/2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
I don't have a problem with most of what you say here given that Richard is
either out of control or is just pretending to be but to describe a potential
c
Share, how would you like it if you woke up one morning, went to the
domes and found that graffiti had been painted all over them. Guess you
would be alright with that?
On 09/03/2014 05:14 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
turq, do you even realize what a malicious b
On 09/03/2014 12:58 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
I call for '200 posts per month' limit. That should be easy
for any moderator to manage.
Nah, just boot him. Like yo
n't get to read Share's posts any more.
From: "TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
From: "jedi_spock@... [Fair
Nail on the head, Steve - Indeed, "the grooviest". Hilarious! Also the
clearest, most real post from Share, EVER. Thank you, both!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
All good points Share, although I think they will be missed by Barry.
In some ways, I think he's stuck in a 60's, o
fe@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
From: "jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
For
___
From: "TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WTF - For Rick
From: "jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To flood the fo
On 9/3/2014 8:48 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
well, well, well,
hey, I'm fine with 200 post per month, Jedi.
Count me in.
Just don't lecture me, or preach to me, as some here.
Me too! That sounds just about right, Steve. 200 posts per month for the
FFL discu
On 9/3/2014 8:40 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
*I don't have a problem with most of what you say here given that
Richard is either out of control or is just pretending to be but to
describe a potential conversation with you at FFL to be potentially
"pleasant" is pretty hila
On 9/3/2014 8:29 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Calm down Steve. You seem to have taken Judy's role here?
Be reasonable. WillyTex is making the forum virtualy
unreadable.
I propose "200 posts per month" rule. That should be easy
for any moderator to handle.
>
Let's take a v
Please don't forget that the Turq who is now bringing up the issue of posting
limits, was consistently among the 3 top poster before limits was enforced. The
Turq doesn't like what Richard is posting. Period. Particularily he hates being
reminded constantly about his years with the fraudulant la
The Turq's problem is that you, amongs very few posters, post knowledge. This
obviously drives him nuts as he doesn't want knowledge, all he wants is carry
on as before because his so-called "Buddhism" has told him he's already
enlightened and has no need of any further "knowledge" not to mentio
On 9/3/2014 7:53 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
The Turq obviously reads every word Richard writes.
>
Apparently - unless you're thinking he did all this work and /still
didn't read any/, which would be even more bizarre. He spent what, three
hours fiddling with filters in Yahoo Mail, and four or
On 9/3/2014 2:58 AM, jedi_spock@... mailto:jedi_spock@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
>
This is funny - a guy that obviously does
well, well, well,
hey, I'm fine with 200 post per month, Jedi.
Count me in.
Just don't lecture me, or preach to me, as some here.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Calm down Steve. You seem to have taken Judy's role here?
Be reasonable. WillyTex is makin
On 9/3/2014 7:18 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I don't advocate controlling content, but just curious, what is the
percentage of MJ postings that slam anything TMO,95%, which is not
necessary a problem except that it also can amount to more than 50
comments a week.
>
Th
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
A friend who used to post here sent this short reaction to dropping by FFL for
a look today to me in email. I thought it was worth sharing with the forum:
No wonder I never bother looking in. Tex is outta control! Or maybe it’s just
that there
Calm down Steve. You seem to have taken Judy's role here?
Be reasonable. WillyTex is making the forum virtualy
unreadable.
I propose "200 posts per month" rule. That should be easy
for any moderator to handle.
--- wrote :
I don't advocate controlling content, but just curious, what is t
On 9/3/2014 7:14 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
turq, do you even realize what a malicious bully you sound like?!
>
He probably is too self-absorbed to analyze his own narcissistic
tendencies, or realize he is acting like a bully, Share. You are really
asking a lot
The Turq obviously reads every word Richard writes.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
turq, do you even realize what a malicious bully you sound like?! You want to
nuke someone for writing a lot of posts?! I think you're the one out of
control. You say you ignore so many people o
On 9/3/2014 4:35 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Well, the dude is certainly consistent, just a shame none of it was
worth reading, but you can't have everything.
Less is clearly more, zero would be nice for a while... but don't ban
him, I think he's essential to remind us what a lifetime on the
Hi
On 9/3/2014 7:18 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I don't advocate controlling content, but just curious, what is the
percentage of MJ postings that slam anything TMO,95%, which is not
necessary a problem except that it also can amount to more than 50
comments a week.
What
All good points Share, although I think they will be missed by Barry.
In some ways, I think he's stuck in a 60's, or 70's mentality, where
everything is "groovy", and he's the grooviest of them all.
And as you say, for all the ignoring of the posts he talks about, well, does
it make any se
*From:* "jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
>
On 9/3/2014 3:52 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
For those whose brains are so atrophied from the practice
On 9/3/2014 2:58 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
>
/This is funny - a guy that obviously doesn't even read my posts, and
has never, in over ten years had a discussion wit
I don't advocate controlling content, but just curious, what is the percentage
of MJ postings that slam anything TMO, 95%, which is not necessary a problem
except that it also can amount to more than 50 comments a week.
What percent of your postings include some gratuitous negative comment abo
turq, do you even realize what a malicious bully you sound like?! You want to
nuke someone for writing a lot of posts?! I think you're the one out of
control. You say you ignore so many people on FFL. So just add one more to your
list. Why is it so hard for you to ignore Richard? Maybe that's wh
Well, the dude is certainly consistent, just a shame none of it was worth
reading, but you can't have everything.
Less is clearly more, zero would be nice for a while... but don't ban him, I
think he's essential to remind us what a lifetime on the Highest Path can do
for you.
---In F
From: "jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
For those whose brains are so atrophied from the practice of TM that they
cannot do math, so far this week Richard Williams has managed to make
To flood the forum like a huge dump truck is clearly
malicious intent.
I think he's gone totally nuts.
I call for '200 posts per month' limit. That should be easy
for any moderator to manage.
By the way, Vaj's email is also bouncing. Is he dead as
well?
--- wrote :
A friend who used
Thanks. Undoubtedly it will. Everything in the world is becoming pretty
transparent these days, including FFL.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
> >
> > from the BatGap Blog:
> >
> > Jim Flanegin on Oc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" wrote:
>
> from the BatGap Blog:
>
> Jim Flanegin on October 1, 2011 at 2:22 pm said (commenting on
> www.batgap.com, Karen Richards interviewed by Rick Archer):
>
> I really got a lot out of this interview. Because of Karen's career as a
>
On top of it as usual, thanks Alex!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Chris Menkemeyer wrote:
> > >
> > > [spam deleted]
> >
> > From the site:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Chris Menkemeyer wrote:
> >
> > [spam deleted]
>
> From the site:
> "Offer Promotion Ends Tomorrow: Saturday, August 27, 2011"
>
> Chris is this the product of some spyware spam bot on y
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 11/9/05 9:58 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> CDC May Distribute 1918 Killer Flu
> >> AP - Wed Nov 9, 1:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 11/9/05 9:58 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> CDC May Distribute 1918 Killer Flu
> >> AP - Wed Nov 9, 1:
on 11/9/05 9:58 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> CDC May Distribute 1918 Killer Flu
>> AP - Wed Nov 9, 1:18 PM ET
>> ATLANTA - Federal scientists say they will consider requests to ship
>> the recentl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> CDC May Distribute 1918 Killer Flu
> AP - Wed Nov 9, 1:18 PM ET
> ATLANTA - Federal scientists say they will consider requests to ship
> the recently recreated 1918 killer flu virus to select U.S. research
> lab
80 matches
Mail list logo
