--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Joe wrote:
>
> > See, Judy knows what we're all thinking. She "knows" that
> > we all secretly agree with her, but since we can't admit
> > it, we're all lying.
> >
> > That is some funny shit Judy, but I guess it
On Feb 16, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:
>> Stew in your own swill, folks. I'll see you in a week.
>
> In my own Gmail feed, I just manually counted your posts starting from the
> 14th's post count, and I have you at 50. The post count script has its own
> Gmail feed, and it usually squ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > We know that Curtis has a strong bias, but what
> > > makes him post prejudicial statements is unclear.
> > >
> Shemp:
> > But Curtis IS black...
> >
> All the more surprising to see Curtis post comments about
> little 'br
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > So it all boils down to you thinking your perspective is
> > the proper one concerning a joke I made to someone else
> > here and you feeling entitled to try to
> > We know that Curtis has a strong bias, but what
> > makes him post prejudicial statements is unclear.
> >
Shemp:
> But Curtis IS black...
>
All the more surprising to see Curtis post comments about
little 'brown' boys, snake-oil and the Dalai Lama, Indian
food, Hindu weddings, or Monte
On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Joe wrote:
See, Judy knows what we're all thinking. She "knows" that we all
secretly agree with her, but since we can't admit it, we're all lying.
That is some funny shit Judy, but I guess it's one way to go
through life.
Correction: it's one way to go thro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> > Only 3 more left to go--and then
> > it's heaven for the rest of the week.
>
> You and I both counted wrong, Sal. You'll be *ecstatic*
> to know I went over by one pos
I say leniency is in order for a small oversight like this.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> > Only 3 more left to go--and then
> > it's heaven for the rest of the week.
>
> You and I both counted wrong,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> > Only 3 more left to go--and then
> > it's heaven for the rest of the week.
>
> You and I both counted wrong, Sal. You'll be *ecstatic*
> to know I went over by one post
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> Only 3 more left to go--and then
> it's heaven for the rest of the week.
You and I both counted wrong, Sal. You'll be *ecstatic*
to know I went over by one post because I failed to
count the two I made just after 7:00 EST but before
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> So it all boils down to you thinking your perspective is
> the proper one concerning a joke I made to someone else
> here and you feeling entitled to try to shame me for
> making it.
Translation: Curtis is fully entitled to expr
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:21 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
>
> > I'm gonna say that even Judy will find these funny.
>
> Want to take bets on that one, lurk? After all,
> the jokes are "mocking" a dead guy.
> And those of us who are lau
On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:21 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
> I'm gonna say that even Judy will find these funny.
Want to take bets on that one, lurk? After all,
the jokes are "mocking" a dead guy.
And those of us who are laughing should
all be ashamed--ASHAMED--I tell you!
Sal
I'm gonna say that even Judy will find these funny.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" wrote:
> >
> >
> > ROTFL! Talk about the guilty pleasure of the year.this is it! You're a
> > riot Judy. A sad riot admittedl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" wrote:
>
>
> ROTFL! Talk about the guilty pleasure of the year.this is it! You're a
> riot Judy. A sad riot admittedly, but a riot.
I appreciate that you are enjoying this Joe. It is an odd exercise and I was
sure I wore my audience out pursuing
On Feb 15, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Joe wrote:
> ROTFL! Talk about the guilty pleasure of the year.this is it! You're a
> riot Judy. A sad riot admittedly, but a riot.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>
>> You really are utterly contemptible, Curtis. You must
>> be t
So it all boils down to you thinking your perspective is the proper one
concerning a joke I made to someone else here and you feeling entitled to try
to shame me for making it.
Judy:
> No matter *how* much contempt one has for a person,
> and even if that contempt were completely justified,
> on
See, Judy knows what we're all thinking. She "knows" that we all secretly agree
with her, but since we can't admit it, we're all lying.
That is some funny shit Judy, but I guess it's one way to go through life.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@y
ROTFL! Talk about the guilty pleasure of the year.this is it! You're a riot
Judy. A sad riot admittedly, but a riot.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> You really are utterly contemptible, Curtis. You must
> be taking lessons from Barry: Lie about somebody, and
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> You really are utterly contemptible, Curtis. You must
> be taking lessons from Barry: Lie about somebody, and
> when you're caught, pretend *they* were lying.
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > > > Judy Defending Richard
> > > > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > I never called you a liar Judy.
> >
> > Well, ya know, Curtis, when you say you "trust
> > reasonable people to see through this obvious routine,"
> > it's h
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > I never called you a liar Judy.
>
> Well, ya know, Curtis, when you say you "trust
> reasona
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> I never called you a liar Judy.
Well, ya know, Curtis, when you say you "trust
reasonable people to see through this obvious routine,"
it's hard to interpret that a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
I never called you a liar Judy. I was defending myself against your claim that
I was lying. And I'm not thinking that you are lying. I get that you believe
what you are saying, just as I do. For me just because there are places where
You really are utterly contemptible, Curtis. You must
be taking lessons from Barry: Lie about somebody, and
when you're caught, pretend *they* were lying.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > Me:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > > Judy Defending Richard
> > > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I.
>
> Posting other parts of the message
I didn't post "other parts of the me
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > Me:
> > > Nice to see you pile on instead of taking Richard to task
> > > for his twisted accusation.
> >
> > Judy defending Richard:
> > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I.
>
> Here I was explaining to Curtis *why
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > Judy Defending Richard
> > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I.
Posting other parts of the message doesn't change your defense of Richard here
Judy.
You are denying defending Richard here, do I have that right Judy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > > This posting topic started because I made a joke about
> > > Michael's death. And when Richard accused me of being
> > > prejudiced for making it, you piled on,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> > Curtis is lying about my having defended Willytex.
> > Of course, that doesn't bother Barry...
>
> From the post I was referring to:
Hmm, I wonder why Curtis did
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > This posting topic started because I made a joke about
> > Michael's death. And when Richard accused me of being
> > prejudiced for making it, you piled on, defending both
> > Richard and Michael.
>
> Ooops, now you're just flat-out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> Curtis is lying about my having defended Willytex.
> Of course, that doesn't bother Barry...
>From the post I was referring to:
Me:
> Nice to see you pile on instead of taking Richard to task
> for his twisted accusation.
Judy de
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> > This posting topic started because I made a joke about
> > Michael's death. And when Richard accused me of being
> > prejudiced for making it, you piled on, defen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> I've heard is that he was a case of
> > arrested development. He never had a real childhood,
> > and he remained very immature emotionally. It was
> > easier for him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> . . .
> At least now I have a better understanding of why he got
> away with it all those years. The fact that you would even
> repeat his own excuse as if it is a legitimate psychological
> theory amazes me.
> . . .
> This po
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
I've heard is that he was a case of
> arrested development. He never had a real childhood,
> and he remained very immature emotionally. It was
> easier for him to relate to children than to adults
> (especially given his superstar status,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
> But Curtis IS black.
>
> I went to MIU with Curtis and I can attest to you that he is:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrHezTLex2s
Thanks for the clarification although I only claim to be black from the waist
down...
>
>
>
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:54 PM, ShempMcGurk wrote:
>
>
>
> Richard:
>
> But Curtis IS black.
>
> I went to MIU with Curtis and I can attest to you that he is:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrHezTLex2s
>
>
>
Here I just thought Curtis was a wigger. His being black would explain why
he lives
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Not all singers are black, and not all black
> > > singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement
> > > from Curtis. Go figure.
> > >
> Curtis:
> > That was a shitty thing to say Richard.
> >
> From what I've read, Curtis
> > Not all singers are black, and not all black
> > singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement
> > from Curtis. Go figure.
> >
Curtis:
> That was a shitty thing to say Richard.
>
>From what I've read, Curtis is predjudiced
against Hindus, once calling them little 'brown'
boys. But most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> The second case was weaker but Tom Sneddon at the DA's
> office thought it was good enough to go through with the
> immense hassle and expense.
Expose of Tom Sneddon:
http://surftofind.com/seminal2
Part 2 of a four-part serie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
> Were you trying to attack the credibility of the source,
> is that what all those "rights" about?
Just thought it was pretty funny that immediately
after you (mistakenly) dismissed the two detailed
Wikipedia articles as "put up b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> So you discovered other points of view on the case. So have I, and like the
> LA DA, I have made up my mind. The many articles I have read, including the
> Esqu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
So you discovered other points of view on the case. So have I, and like the LA
DA, I have made up my mind. The many articles I have read, including the
Esquire article, which attack specifics of the complicated cases don't change
once
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > > Michael Jackson was a child molester
> >
> > Quite sure of that, are you? Have some insider info?
>
> Yup quite sure of it. As is the LA DA's office who put
>
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
wrote:
The second case was weaker but Tom Sneddon at the DA's office thought it was
good enough to go through with the immense hassle and expense. Ultimately the
Jury hated the kid's mom so much they had reasonable doubt. I don't bl
Oh, okay. You mentioned Chandler's book. I am not familiar with that. Perhaps
that presents a stronger case.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
wrote:
>
> wrote:
>
> > Michael Jackson was a child molester who should have died in prison. His
> > death not tragic
wrote:
> Michael Jackson was a child molester who should have died in prison. His
> death not tragic to me and anytime I speak of him it will be with disdain for
> his criminal acts against children. I mock his death as the end of a
> disgusting person who evaded justice but ended up a victi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> >
> > Michael Jackson was a child molester
>
> Quite sure of that, are you? Have some insider info?
Yup quite sure of it. As is the LA DA's office who put their credibility on the
line in pursuit of justice. But if you want to go b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > You learn so much more about a person's values by what
> > they do rather than what they say.
>
> And from what they choose to do for fun on
> Valentine's Da
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> Michael Jackson was a child molester who should have died
> in prison. His death not tragic to me and anytime I speak
> of him it will be with disdain...
To be honest, if I did speak of him it would
be with disinterest, not di
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> You learn so much more about a person's values by what
> they do rather than what they say.
And from what they choose to do for fun on
Valentine's Day. I'm going out with my lady
shortly to watch the first of the Carnivale
par
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> >
> > > Not all singers are black, and not all black
> > > singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
>
> > Not all singers are black, and not all black
> > singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement
> > from Curtis. Go figure.
>
> That was a shitty thing to say R
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" wrote:
> Not all singers are black, and not all black
> singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement
> from Curtis. Go figure.
That was a shitty thing to say Richard.
>
>
>
> Curtis:
> > > I think the Sleepy Time Napping Academy has
Curtis:
> > I think the Sleepy Time Napping Academy has
> > a non-consciousness based curriculum.
> >
Isn't sleeping a state of consciousness? Is there
anything that exists outside of consciousness, and
if so, how would you know? LOL!
> > Especially if you take the Michael Jackson
> > insp
> > Sounds sadly like the death of
> > consciousness-based education.
> >
Vaj:
> Is there a type of education that
> isn't consciousness-based?
>
Yes. Apparently you don't understand
what the 'enlightenment tradition' is.
This is a set-up, right, Vaj?
The enlightenment tradition of India i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a type of education that isn't consciousness-based?
> > >
> >
> > I think the Sleepy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > Is there a type of education that isn't consciousness-based?
> >
>
> I think the Sleepy Time Napping Academy has a non-consciousness based
> curriculum. Especially if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> Is there a type of education that isn't consciousness-based?
>
I think the Sleepy Time Napping Academy has a non-consciousness based
curriculum. Especially if you take the Michael Jackson inspired Propofol Major.
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2010, at
ce in Pakistan or other
Islamic countries, but it was at one time.
From: ShempMcGurk
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, February 13, 2010 7:39:16 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: students can now attend mum without learning tm,-
and the puja is opt
On Feb 13, 2010, at 11:11 PM, Buck wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nadarrombus" wrote:
> > >
> > > breaking news- the puja requirement has been eliminated from learning tm
> > > and mum students
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" wrote:
>
> > On Behalf Of Buck
> >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com "nadarrombus" wrote:
> > >
> > > breaking news- the puja requirement has been eliminated from
> > > learning tm and mum students can attend without learning and
> >
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 9:09 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: students can now attend mum without learning
tm,- and the puja is optional
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nadarrombus" wrote:
> >
> > breaking news- the puja requirement has been eliminated from learning tm
> > and mum students can attend without learning and or learn without the puja.
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nadarrombus" wrote:
>
> breaking news- the puja requirement has been eliminated from learning tm and
> mum students can attend without learning and or learn without the puja. it is
> all now optional, or not, anyone participates even though they were neve
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "nadarrombus" >wrote:
>
> breaking news- the puja requirement has been eliminated from learning tm and
> mum students can attend without learning and or learn without the puja. it is
> all now optional, or not, anyone participates even though they were nev
69 matches
Mail list logo
