But, can you levitate, Mr. Wright? Can you levitate?
>
On 9/3/2014 8:04 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Some who have avoided the common TM malady of having brain matter the
consistency of "the lightness of cotton fiber" :-) may have heard of
DoS -- a Denial of Serv
Rick Archer wrote:
> >From now on, when someone gets banned for overposting, the ban will cover
> not just one calendar week from the day they overposted, but the remainder
> of that week, plus the entire following week, Friday to Friday. So for
> instance, Shemp, who overposted yesterday, will be
On Oct 8, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From now on, when someone gets banned for overposting, the ban will
cover not just one calendar week from the day they overposted, but
the remainder of that week, plus the entire following week, Friday
to Friday. So for instance, Shemp, who ove
On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Judy and Shemp are both over by 2. Turq intentionally went over by
one last week and I didn’t suspend him, so in fairness to them,
I’ll cut them some slack. But if either of them posts again before
Friday night, I’ll have to suspend them. Jud
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rick Archer
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:35 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Overposting - Angela's done for the week
59 posts since Friday midnight. Judy has 30. No one else is very cl
Rick Archer wrote:
> Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation land. No posts
> for her until Friday. Curtis overposted by one. Light slap on the wrist.
> Even though everyone but New Morning is opposed to it, I'm seriously
> thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system. You c
lets stay as we are but for the sake of change do so for a week.
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
On May 3, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:21 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Overposting
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
We can
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:21 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Overposting
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
We can always go back to 5 a day if 35 a week doesn't
In a message dated 5/3/07 12:17:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I’m seriously thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system. You can shoot
your wad in one day and we won’t hear from you for a week, or you can pace
yourself
This plan has my vote.
On May 3, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Vaj wrote:
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
On May 3, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation land. No
posts for her until Friday. Curtis overposted by one. Light slap on
the wrist. Even though
It would be easier for you, Rick, if you informed the
overposters that their posts beyond 5 or 35 would be
deleted. I certainly would not get into the hassle of
storing them and approving them so that 11 posts today
are approved at the rate of 5 today and 5 tomorrow and
1 the next day.
--- Rick
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
On May 3, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation land.
No posts for her until Friday. Curtis overposted by one. Light slap
on the wrist. Even though everyone but New Morning is opposed to
13 matches
Mail list logo
