RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn#39;t more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread emilymaenot
Well, I couldn't figure out my question either. Let me rephrase: Share, do you agree that Judy *did* include qualifiers, including the one you specifically mention (sounds like) in the section of said post below that I have copied to this one? Share, this is a yes/no question. I won't

RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn#39;t more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread sharelong60
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example she gave. What I mainly remember is how she initially responded and how she continues to write to and about

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn#39;t more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread awoelflebater
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example she gave. What I mainly remember is how she

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn#39;t more interesting, in one graphic

2013-12-02 Thread authfriend
Share tries her hardest to create confusion: Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example she gave. No, I gave no example, Share. Rather, I