Says Share, still trying desperately to annoy me even though Doc has clearly
indicated he has no desire to dump on either of the Clintons:
> I still don't understand how Clinton could have been so well, dumb. Was she
> really that attractive?! Ok,
> maybe he cracked under the pressure of t
I still don't understand how Clinton could have been so well, dumb. Was she
really that attractive?! Ok, maybe he cracked under the pressure of the job.
But really, so much about it is unfathomable. Must be karma (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Who knows the truth of it? I
Who knows the truth of it? I kinda agree with Judy on this one, about the
public view of private lives, up to a point. For example, that former head of
the IMF, who turned out to be a rapist, should be publicly castrated, imo. As
far as Bill and Hillary, though, and all of their drama, all I can
Doc, it's not just because of what was exposed. It was how she reacted to what
was exposed. And that she was an enabler, allowing it to happen over and over
during all those previous years and doing seemingly little to take a stand
against it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
F
Fair enough - your opinions, and your vote, are certainly your own, but to cast
Hillary as some sort of victim, and an enabler, simply because of what was
exposed, I think is short-sighted.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage.
Share tries to dig herself out of her hole:
> I agree that no one knows what goes on in a marriage. However, when one
> willingly becomes a public figure, then one has to accept that one's private
> life
> is also going to come under scrutiny.
Yes, this is a recent but very unfortunate
