The 9/11 attackers were here on student, business, or tourist visas. None of
the terrorists motivated by extremist Islam since 9/11 committing attacks in
the U.S. were refugees. Most were born here or were naturalized citizens.
IOW, keeping Muslim refugees out is exremely unlikely to prevent t
Salyavin was wrong about Doug deleting posts. Salyavin has now deleted his own
post, but it was up long enough for some folks to see it, and of course it went
to everyone who gets the posts by email, so I thought it would be a good idea
to point out that it was in error.
As you might imagine
I know it was embarrassing for you, Salyavin, but try to calm down. Everyone
makes mistakes, and you made the erroneous report in good faith. (Or so I
assume.) The good news is that the archive is intact; there haven't been any
mass deletes. So let's just be happy about that, eh?
---In Fairf
If you're talking about Donald Trump, no, he hasn't shot himself in the foot,
and no, it's not over for him yet. And none of the GOP candidates is a Trump
wannabe. The GOP is terrified of Trump and is trying to figure out how to get
rid of him. They know that if he wins the nomination, the party
The media and Trump's opponents have been very timid so far in their
criticisms. That makes him look strong and brave. If they were to really go
after him with no holds barred, he'd crumble, because he's a bully. Joe
Scarborough on Fox on Tuesday tried to get him to stop talking so he and Mika
You mean, no answer that you agree with.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yes Trump is a wild card alright.
BBC Radio were today comparing Trump's style to Peter Finch's rant in Network.
The problem for those who oppose Trump (most everyone) is that they have no
answer t
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You mean, no answer that you agree with.
No answer that I've even heard of!
Uh, right. It would be hard to disagree with an answer you hadn't heard of.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
I said "No answer that you agree with" because there are, of course, plenty of
answers that have been proposed from all shades of the political spectrum,
including liberals. Most are realistic enough to acknowledge that no answer is
going to be perfect (except, perhaps, for Ted Cruz, who wants t
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/i-will-never-leave-this-race/2015/12/08/af1b1d46-9ad2-11e5-8917-653b65c809eb_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/i-will-never-leave-this-race/2015/12/08/af1b1d46-9ad2-11e5-8917-653b65c809eb_story.html
It's polyvagal, in case anyone wants to look it up.
--In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It doesn't even mention yogic flying.. and Why? He's a realist too. This move
of Hagelin's comes well within an alignment of the latest of scientific and
post-modern thinking of the Polyvegal
Both the Fox News atheist and the Salon writer are now on my shit list.
The atheist guy is quoted as saying:
"Ninety percent of atheists don’t call themselves atheists; the real number
[of atheists] isn’t 3 percent but 35 percent."
The article writer elaborates:
"(The Pew Research
Citing lack of evidence for something as evidence for it is irrational and
paranoid. That most people want tighter gun control is not evidence they want
to "confiscate all weapons at a moments notice." There's zero evidence for the
latter. And "incrementally over generations" doesn't help. The p
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
*Irrational* means a lack of reason, no explanation, not a lack of evidence.
Not what I said; read it again.
People seeking power, such as Democrats can't openly say that they want to
disarm society. Only their backers and supporters can,
FWIW, "malheur" is the French word for adversity, misfortune, tragedy. Let's
hope the name isn't apt.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
My inner cynic says nothing will happen at all because the offenders aren't
black and unarmed. The fact that they took over a Federal facility
She's correcting (and blaming) herself, not you, Mike.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
What? They're cause? You wrote that, not me. Should be *their cause* not
*they're cause*. *Their* denotes possession, as in the cause belongs to them.
They're means *they are *. Shee
Happens to the best of us. But it probably doesn't tend to change "their" to
"they're." Emily's saying that was her mistake, not autocorrect's.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
That's nice because I' mentioned once or twice that Auto- correct changed
something for me withou
Good GRIEF.
LOL. Very funny, Doug!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Verdi - Aida Marcia Trionfale (Triumphal March) SCALA MILANO - Luciano
Pavarotti https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DY3YANFxpOM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DY3YANFxpOM
Verdi - Aida Marcia Trionfale (
I did my two-week "flying block" at MIU/MUM in summer 1984 (I think it was).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Surveying,
How many of you reading or writing here at FFL have been to Fairfield, Iowa?
As a meditator?
Otherwise, I am wanting to survey some policy thi
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Uh-oh
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/29/official-some-clinton-emails-too-damaging-to-release.html#.VqwjkvUhTPc.email
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/29/official-some-clinton-emails-too-damaging-to-release.html#.VqwjkvUhTPc.email
You know, I'm actually more disturbed by the egregious typo in the subject
heading (are TMers illiterate?) than by its mention of MUM.
Obviously, the subject line was written by whoever at the "email4you" outfit
gathers the articles it sends FFL a couple times a week. I don't think it's a
TMO
Doug, I hate the spin and the misleading too. I just don't think this subject
heading really falls into that category when you take the article itself into
account, which focused so heavily on MUM as the source of the interest in
Sanders, as if MUM were the only thing that counted in Fairfield.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
What's the point?
I was listening to Yank playwright Bonnie Greer today and she mentioned
something that really shook me: Trump has no chance of becoming President (no -
that bit didn't shake me!) because even if he wins every caucus/primary he
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re "Did she say how she thought they would do this? . . . Would cause a
gigantic ruckus."
(snip)
I think Bonnie is right about the principle though. (I've heard it mentioned
before.) The delegates who eventually choose the one president
As of midnight:
AP projects Cruz beats Trump, 27.7% to 24.3%. Rubio is third with 23.1%.
Clinton and Sanders are neck-and-neck, with Clinton very slightly ahead.
O'Malley and Huckabee have suspended their campaigns.
In Iowa as a whole, Bernie's behind Hillary by only 3/10 of a percentage point
(49.6 to 49.9), according to the NYTimes this morning. Given the way delegates
are allocated, this likely means the two will end up with the same number of
Iowa delegates at the convention.
---In
I know you didn't mean it snarkily! Just figured I'd short-circuit your
inadvertently passing it on.
As to over-the-top reaction, I've seen it spelled by right-wingers "DemocRAT
Party." So it isn't as if Dems are just being too sensitive...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrot
Fiorina and Christie are "suspending" (ending) their campaigns.
I imagine she'd expect you to answer that for yourself (if you even really
needed to ask the question): She's not the only one receiving big money.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Hillary says we've got to get the big money out of politics.
But then says, the b
Ollie, I agree that it's a witch hunt, but let's keep the facts straight: What
they've found *has* been very much front-page news, many times so far. The
media love witch hunts, and they've never been big Hillary fans.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The emails are
Gee, Ollie, CNN isn't left-wing like MSNBC, but it's not right-wing like Fox
either. You'll hear both lefties and righties complaining about its "slant."
And it's much more accurate factually than Fox.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The amount of money poured into each though,
It's almost prohibitively difficult, actually; it was designed to be. And it
can take years.
Those who are not originalists (don't know the term for them) don't
necessarily interpret the original wording in a way that is "clearly at odds
with the obvious reading." It's much more complicated t
"Shyster lawyers"?? We're talking about the Supreme Court here. Since when do
"shyster lawyers" get to rule on interpretation of the Constitution?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re "Allowing for changing attitudes" :
You're making my case for me!
If people's at
No, it was Supreme Court justices who ruled on Roe v. Wade, not "shyster
lawyers." Lawyers, shyster or otherwise, don't get to rule on anything. Only
judges or justices can do that.
And please don't tell me what I can and can't see. You don't have a clue.
---In FairfieldLife
You know that didn't mean *over his face*, right?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The moment I read that he was found with a pillow over his head, I thought oh
geeez, here we go.
From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday,
Not the point. The point is that some have been saying Sanders has exaggerated
his civil rights activism. This photo tends to support his claims. (It's
pro-Sanders, IOW, not anti-Sanders.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
A lot of activists got arrested back in the
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
Also, looking at the early supposed TTC training script (unless it has been
doctored to provide a falsehood), I notice that the giving of the mantra should
be done in such a way as to make the initiate feel that they are getting a
un
1301 - 1336 of 1336 matches
Mail list logo
