> No, no Nastaliq font. It's not the default for Persian anymore. People
> have a hard time reading Nastaliq for anything longer than a few words.
OK, bye-bye Nastaliq for Persian.
But I mean Persian Naskh or Naskhi as opposed to Arabic Naskh. I wish
there were a precise term to differentiate the
>>Remember that accents are different from "HARAKAT"s.<<
We only discussed combining symbols (hamza & madda), not short vowels.
Peter
___
FarsiWeb mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/farsiweb
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Linguasoft wrote:
>
> > For comparison, European keyboards or the US-International keyboard also
> > do not include standalone versions of all accents, and use many keys
> > (accent keys and others) with a "deadkey" function to g
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, C Bobroff wrote:
> For whatever they're worth, they're here as PDF files:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/roman.html
That only mentions there is only one Kurdish letter not already in
Persian. But we know a lot of accent marks are used, while the above
reference only me
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Linguasoft wrote:
> The question remains why you provide direct keyboard input for
> "combining" hamza & madda. Are there any letter combinations other than
> with alef/ya/waw that can be created via combination?
Yes. Heh.
> (I've seen accents added in handwriting for Pashto
