> Le 19 avr. 2019 à 10:19, Hermann Meyer a écrit :
>
>
> Am 19.04.19 um 10:03 schrieb Kjetil Matheussen:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 9:41 AM Hermann Meyer wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 29.11.17 um 12:18 schrieb Stéphane Letz:
> I'm still on faust(0.9.90), but this reads very interesting. I'll check
>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:23 AM Kjetil Matheussen
wrote:
>
> The reason I noticed this was because in Debug mode I always run the
> -fsanitize=address, which sometimes increases CPU usage a lot, and the
> zita reverb often caused overruns. This stopped when not using -vec.
The difference in memo
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:20 AM Hermann Meyer wrote:
>
>
> As well, no proper benchmark here, but, I just give zita_rev1 a shot
> here, and didn't see any spices in guitarix. zita rev in vector mode
> (32) use here ~0.8% DSP when switched on in guitarix.
>
guitarix probably don't use enough memo
Am 19.04.19 um 10:03 schrieb Kjetil Matheussen:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 9:41 AM Hermann Meyer wrote:
Am 29.11.17 um 12:18 schrieb Stéphane Letz:
I'm still on faust(0.9.90), but this reads very interesting. I'll check that
out as soon I've switched to the latest faust-git.
OK
Surly we can'
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 9:41 AM Hermann Meyer wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.11.17 um 12:18 schrieb Stéphane Letz:
> >> I'm still on faust(0.9.90), but this reads very interesting. I'll check
> >> that out as soon I've switched to the latest faust-git.
> > OK
> >> Surly we can't use that in our dsp2cc script
Am 29.11.17 um 12:18 schrieb Stéphane Letz:
I'm still on faust(0.9.90), but this reads very interesting. I'll check that
out as soon I've switched to the latest faust-git.
OK
Surly we can't use that in our dsp2cc script (without implement it ;-) ) but
I'll check it out and find out if it cou
