Hi Martin,
I fixed the Quick Reference. Thanks for the suggestion !
Cheers
Yann
Yann Orlarey
Directeur scientifique
www.grame.fr
2016-06-05 14:38 GMT+02:00 Martin Zuther :
> Hey Yann,
>
> thanks for the fast reply! Now that you say it, this totally makes
> sense and is in line with the way
Hey Yann,
thanks for the fast reply! Now that you say it, this totally makes
sense and is in line with the way Faust works. As I said, I'm pretty
new to Faust, so I don't know much about its quirks yet... :)
However, I think that this should be added to the Faust Quick Reference
(at the end
Hi!
I have been using Faust for a couple of days and am really impressed by
it! I should have stumbled across it years ago...
Anyway, I have found a bug by pure chance -- by typing a really stupid
negated expression from a DSP textbook:
process = _ <: (f : + ~ g) * c0, _ * d0 :> _ with