Hi Oleg,
I agree with you, we should probably think more seriously about introducing
a real NIL in Faust!
Yann
*Yann Orlarey*
Directeur scientifique/Scientific director
orla...@grame.fr T : +33 (0) 4 72 07 37 00
GRAME - Centre national de création musicale
11 cours de Verdun Gensoul | 69002
On 05/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Yann, Stephane, I am curious if it is possible to change the compiler to
> make par(i, 0, expr) work?
the patch below seems to work ;)
but I am sure you can do something better.
Oleg.
--- a/compiler/evaluate/eval.cpp
+++ b/compiler/evaluate/eval.cpp
@@ -919,7
On 05/25, Yann Orlarey wrote:
>
> For example the expression
> `()` or `NIL` in Lisp, which indicates an empty list, does not exist in
> Faust.
Yes. it's a pity ;)
Well, to some degree
nil = 0:!;
resembles the empty list. Say, output(nil) == 0 and
process = sin(nil);
works "as
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> This, and the previous discussion, were helpful in shedding light on
> an aspect of faust on which the docs are somewhat unclear.
>
I hope/guess Yann is going to immediately improve this specific question in the
documentation ((-;
This is the good time since new updated
On 5/25/20, Yann Orlarey wrote:
> Following the recent exchanges, I would like to bring some clarifications
> on pattern matching and lists in Faust.
>
> Strictly speaking, there are no lists in Faust. For example the expression
> `()` or `NIL` in Lisp, which indicates an empty list, does not exis
Following the recent exchanges, I would like to bring some clarifications
on pattern matching and lists in Faust.
Strictly speaking, there are no lists in Faust. For example the expression
`()` or `NIL` in Lisp, which indicates an empty list, does not exist in
Faust. Similarly, the distinction in
