John Baer wrote:
Mo wrote:
Check out Nicu's (with some help from me :) ) Inkscape article that
just
got published to Red Hat Magazine today:
Wow this is exactly what I hoped would happen. Great work on the
article!
John, then you may like also a couple of GIMP tutorials I published
The theme is already set in stone, Flying High is selected and goes into
polishing stage. The wiki page is not updated [1] to reflect the change.
Other tasks to be done are:
- More Echo icons development (artist should choose the icons they want
to work on and apply it on the wiki)
- Providing
This is a request to provide a comparison chart for the number of icons
done for Echo with Tango and Generic icons.
I think the focus should be on the generic icons instead of application
based icons that can be done on post Fedora 7.
--
¢D0
Jiri Jakub Masek wrote:
Hi, there (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/artwork) is an appeal there:
*HELP WANTED .Help out with FC7's theme* isn't it a confusion?
*More info* does not give an information about the time of the end of
contributing this theme, or does it? Or things are different
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
This is a request to provide a comparison chart for the number of icons
done for Echo with Tango and Generic icons.
I think the focus should be on the generic icons instead of application
based icons that can be done on post Fedora 7.
John
While there's talk of hosting and aggregating... I know you've mentioned
deviantart. It might be worth taking a look at art.gnome.org for ideas too.
Recently they changed policy to accept only Gnome related backdrops (I
had contribbed some Nature / Abstract ones). I was a bit
Cam wrote:
John
While there's talk of hosting and aggregating... I know you've mentioned
deviantart. It might be worth taking a look at art.gnome.org for ideas too.
Using art.gnome.org was one of the ideas proposed by Mairin but she also
said I don't think we have the resources for
Máirín Duffy wrote:
1) Overall does this seem reasonable as a replacement for the existing
art page? Is there anything we're forgetting?
Yes but now we are left with two pages - ArtTeam and Artwork. The
artwork specifications are also duplicated in two pages.
2) An intentional omission
