Kelly wrote:
On Friday, July 06, 2007 8:45 pm Leo wrote:
On 05/07/2007, Kelly wrote:
I mean, the capabilities of the graphical boot system are present in
the Linux kernel itself
Is this true? In which version of kernel?
I can't name off a specific kernel version, but I know that other
John Baer wrote:
All,
I put together a wiki page of sounds from the free sound project which
I am currently using with Fedora 7.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F8Themes/GnomeSounds
Better sound themes is a good effort though I am not sure whether we
need to enable it by default.
Please post screenshots or link to them in the wiki. Installation
instructions to try out the theme would also be nice.
Rahul
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Martin Sourada wrote:
Please post screenshots or link to them in the wiki. Installation
instructions to try out the theme would also be nice.
Rahul
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 14:06 +0200, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
http://www.manucornet.net/pub/olpc/gtk-theme-torturer.tgz
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/GTK_for_OLPC#GTK_theme.2Fengine_torturer_and_crash_tester
Better or atleast equivalent performance is important.
Rahul
I downloaded the
Martin Sourada wrote:
As for the rpm. I've just created it [1]. As for the performance - I
tested only metacity theme, I don't know how to do benchmark on gtk
theme, but Daniel says murrine engine is faster then clearlooks. Here
are the results for metacity:
$ metacity-theme-viewer Clearlooks
The big problem with the murrine engine is it does not honour colour
preferences like a well-behaved theme.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
John Baer wrote:
Thanks for the comments. At this early stage I just wanted to see which
style had the most appeal.
Even thought this is the early stages, you still need to respect the
licenses and the rights of the authors of any works you've borrowed that
are not your own. Please attribute
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 15:27 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
The big problem with the murrine engine is it does not honour colour
preferences like a well-behaved theme.
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 15:50 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 15:27 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
The big problem with the murrine engine is it does not honour colour
preferences like a well-behaved theme.
___
Fedora-art-list
Hi,
please excuse, is this an official Sticker which can be used, produced
and sell by anyone?
Take a look at
http://www.linux-onlineshop.de/product_info.php/info/p1113_Notebook-Sticker-Fedora.html
I wonder, because I never saw, that we call it Fedora linux ...
Just a question :-)
--
Gerold Kassube wrote:
Hi,
please excuse, is this an official Sticker which can be used, produced
and sell by anyone?
Take a look at
http://www.linux-onlineshop.de/product_info.php/info/p1113_Notebook-Sticker-Fedora.html
I wonder, because I never saw, that we call it Fedora linux ...
Just a
Rahul,
I'll do so; there are more than only one violation.
I asked within another question also in the Ambassador-ML and also
informed the Webshop and legal .
On the other hand:
Why we don't create such official stickers and announce them for free
usage on the fedorawiki; we can see, that
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 12:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Baer wrote:
To the best of my knowledge the photo's I did not personally take
would
meet the licensing terms of the wiki and open source. I would never
suggest we use someone's effort without their approval.
If this is
John Baer wrote:
More curious than anything else. If we are Ok with the creative commons
license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ , then what
does #7 of the CLA need in order to be satisfied?
I'm not a lawyer, but the CLA itself seems to suggest:
you may submit it to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
