The wiki though it needs some fine touch is functional. I remember Diana
used to
keep track on the icon name specs but I don't find the actual url.
I noticed some 24x24 icons works quite well in isometric view. I suggest
to make a tango style vesion for comparison purpose. The drive will be a
bit
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 09:57 +0200, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
The wiki though it needs some fine touch is functional. I remember Diana
used to
keep track on the icon name specs but I don't find the actual url.
Yeah, it needs some refinement, but I still don't have much wiki editing
skills, so it
hi,
another thing do discuss in Echo Icons Guidelines [1] are the sizes of
icons [2] that will be in the package. So I propose three basic sizes
and one optional size, following the tango example [3]:
1. Extra Small (16x16)
2. Small
a) 22x22
b) 24x24
3. Medium (32x32, optional)
4. Large
Martin Sourada wrote:
hi,
another thing do discuss in Echo Icons Guidelines [1] are the sizes of
icons [2] that will be in the package. So I propose three basic sizes
and one optional size, following the tango example [3]:
The optional, 32x32, size is used in Windows (which is probably not our
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 12:16 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Hi Martin!
32x32 is used in KDE a lot and is also used on the gnome-main-menu
(SLAB), as well in the new control-center shell.
We put that size in gnome-icon-theme for that reason.
- Andreas
Didn't know about that. I'll change the
Hi,
one of the things that bugs me about the current echo, is the
category-internet icon. It uses Bluecurve's globe which for various
reasons doesn't follow the Echo guidelines. The most notable things that
I don't like about it are:
a) uses different colour scheme
b) uses different lighting