Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Can someone help me understand the metaphor behind the "Sulphur" name?
The only thing I can think of is sulphur is somewhat related to
dragons and dragons are, like werewolves, mythical creatures. How far
am I?
Not very far
http://fedoraproject.org/
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
So you are saying that there is no special reason why is upstream
gnome would reject it? Can you send this patch to upstream gnome?
It could be just forgotten, like other bugs and patches in their
bugzilla...
Ie. icon view in file picker, single
2008/1/28, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Mark!
> You can check it out in Michael Ventnors blog [1] (along with his other
> cool work on firefox3, like native gtk+ printing support etc.).
> It's possible to just untar one of the nightly builds into a folder in
> your home directory [2] s
Mark wrote:
2008/1/27, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I want to tell you the good news.
Firefox in Trunk is now better tangoified :) !
Still some icons are missing, but Firefox is nearer its release :) .
I think that you should see what progress is being made and try to mak
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
So you are saying that there is no special reason why is upstream
gnome would reject it? Can you send this patch to upstream gnome?
It could be just forgotten, like other bugs and patches in their
bugzilla...
Ie. icon view in file picker, single click i file pick
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 14:45 +0100, Mark wrote:
>
> And so the list can grow and grow. Gnome is doing some awesome things
> under the hood but not much that a normal user will notice, which is a
> same. I'm using gnome BTW ^_^
>
Please, take it off this list.
Gnome development questions are be
2008/1/28, David Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> We have standards for quality of code, we do after all have to maintain
> it. It needs to work, it needs to not introduce bugs and so on. The two
> of us appear to have very little understanding for how programming and
> design works. Just because y
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:43 +0100, David Nielsen wrote:
> We have standards for quality of code, we do after all have to maintain
> it. It needs to work, it needs to not introduce bugs and so on. The two
> of us appear to have very little understanding for how programming and
> design works. Just
man, 28 01 2008 kl. 07:55 +0100, skrev Valent Turkovic:
> 2008/1/28 Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > So you are saying that there is no special reason why is upstream
> > > gnome would reject it? Can you send this patch to upstream gnome?
> >
> > It could be just forgotten, like ot
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Can someone help me understand the metaphor behind the "Sulphur" name?
The only thing I can think of is sulphur is somewhat related to dragons
and dragons are, like werewolves, mythical creatures. How far am I?
Not very far
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Names
Rah
Can someone help me understand the metaphor behind the "Sulphur" name?
The only thing I can think of is sulphur is somewhat related to dragons
and dragons are, like werewolves, mythical creatures. How far am I?
Original Message
Subject: And the F9 codename winner is...
Date:
11 matches
Mail list logo